Visit our Popular Forums

GoingWalkabout · 28-08-2016, 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by newhaul

They already are comming after me I get at least one bit of junk from them each week.
You warned me a couple years to late

Watch out for the space ship. Whacked out crazies they are.

**newhaul** · 28-08-2016, 19:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

Watch out for the space ship. Whacked out crazies they are.

They ain't met me yet . I can drive them to want to jump

SV THIRD DAY · 28-08-2016, 19:33

GoingWalkabout · 28-08-2016, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by newhaul

They ain't met me yet . I can drive them to want to jump

jackdale · 28-08-2016, 20:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

Second, Einstein evolved on the question of an all powerful creator deity. So has Hawkins.

Einstein died one year after the quote. Do tell us how he "evolved".

As for Hawking (note spelling)

Stephen Hawking makes it clear: There is no God - CNET

GoingWalkabout · 28-08-2016, 20:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackdale

Einstein died one year after the quote. Do tell us how he "evolved".

As for Hawking (note spelling)

Stephen Hawking makes it clear: There is no God - CNET

So he evolved and then met his maker

Hawking, smorkens, who cares.

By the way the cut and paste troll likes to throw up inconsequential arguments while ignoring the elephant in the room. Which is. The professor admitted that 80% to 97% of the collected data was not used and wasn't submitted by the data collectors for an unknown reason. In anyone's books to then go ahead and use this intrinsically flawed data to build a model is gross scientific fraud.

I can stab a guess as to why the data collectors (temperature readers) discarded so many data points. It was because of bias. The data thrown away didn't fit what they were looking for.

Now let's see if anyone can answer this honestly. By the way if you just launch into a verbal attack against me or bring up something else not related then we will all know you are unable to defend what is basically indefensible. Scientific fraud.

SV THIRD DAY · 28-08-2016, 20:59

So why do the MMGWC have any credibility for a solution when their last one...well....

We are told that the MMGW movement wouldn't following something that is a known Scam...well...we know Biofuels are a Scam BUT the entire political establishment is bought into it, hook, line and Stinker.

Biofuels worse for climate change than gas, U-M study says

GoingWalkabout · 28-08-2016, 21:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by SV THIRD DAY

So why do the MMGWC have any credibility for a solution when their last one...well....

We are told that the MMGW movement wouldn't following something that is a known Scam...well...we know Biofuels are a Scam BUT the entire political establishment is bought into it, hook, line and Stinker.

Biofuels worse for climate change than gas, U-M study says

Agreed. And let's not forget it was based on "proven science" along with "scientific consensus".

SV THIRD DAY · 28-08-2016, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

Agreed. And let's not forget it was based on "proven science" along with "scientific consensus".

Which is exactly why I posted it.
People act as if Science can be trusted more than any other corrupt group to do the right thing but what they don't understand is that Science and Politics is just as linked and corrupt today as it was when the Pope put Galileo under house arrest.

adoxograph · 28-08-2016, 22:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoingWalkabout

... The professor admitted that 80% to 97% of the collected data was not used and wasn't submitted by the data collectors for an unknown reason. In anyone's books to then go ahead and use this intrinsically flawed data to build a model is gross scientific fraud....

You are trolling, right? You try to immidate Rich, right?

Otherwise the above does not make sense whatsoever. You said you have scientific training and do not know about common scientific data reduction? If I'm wrong please accept my apologies, otherwise here is a chapter out of a textbook so you can educate yourself on the subject. Let me know if you do not understand the maths and I help you out by giving you a laymen version of it.

I really hope that you are trolling.

If you are: Congratulation you are brilliant.

If not OMG

...

Celestialsailor · 28-08-2016, 23:16

This is getting interesting as the plot thickens...

GoingWalkabout · 28-08-2016, 23:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by adoxograph

You are trolling, right? You try to immidate Rich, right?

Otherwise the above does not make sense whatsoever. You said you have scientific training and do not know about common scientific data reduction? If I'm wrong please accept my apologies, otherwise here is a chapter out of a textbook so you can educate yourself on the subject. Let me know if you do not understand the maths and I help you out by giving you a laymen version of it.

I really hope that you are trolling.

If you are: Congratulation you are brilliant.

If not OMG

...

The only trolling I do is for tuna in my dreams.

The erstwhile Professor said as an aside that he doesn't know why they discarded the information. This is an admittance of him not checking the validity of any discarding methodology, if one existed beyond data collector bias.

By the way, I downloaded his YouTube confession as I suspect at some point he will want to take it down.

SailOar · 29-08-2016, 03:35

Newly Discovered Bacteria Could Worsen Climate Change | Mythological World News

A paper from researchers at Georgia Institute of Cultism, and published in the journal Naturopathy, has discovered a bacteria capable of making dead zones deader by depleting the amount of nitrogen in oxygen minimum zones.