Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Powered Boats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-11-2013, 16:20   #1
Registered User
 
Roy M's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southwestern Yacht Club, San Diego, CA
Boat: Searunner 40 trimaran, WILDERNESS
Posts: 3,175
Images: 4
Installed a Lewmar windlass on a Sealine F-44

I'm hoping someone out there has an answer to a question regarding the upgrade of a windlass on a 1998 Sealine F-44. The boat came with a Simpson Lawrence v1000, which eventually decomposed (the gear box turned into grey mush). I just replaced the unit with a new Lewmar V-3, a distinct improvement. The issue is with the thermal breaker on the windlass- it has one, the S/L did not. Normally, this breaker conducts the power to the up/down switches at the two helms and the foredeck, on boats OTHER than this one. The Sealine uses a completely different circuit to power the directional switches to the windlass solenoid. That means that there is separate switching to energize the switches than the main circuit breaker.

While it is possible to rewire, it is an arduous job, meaning it costs a bundle to do it. Technically it's a snap. The option is to simply not use the thermal breaker, making it like the Simpson Lawrence. I will be contacting Sealine, in the UK, for advice, but I'm hoping someone here has had a similar experience and better solution.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0124.jpg
Views:	196
Size:	405.7 KB
ID:	70155  
Roy M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 16:30   #2
Senior Cruiser

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,033
Re: Installed a Lewmar windlass on a Sealine F-44

I have a V4.

I just ignored the thermal wires, at lewmar's engineer's (unofficial) recommendation. They said it was a standard industrial electrical motor, and that the thermal cut off was used/needed for other (continuous) industrial applications but not for the windless use.
estarzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lewmar, wind, windlass


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.