Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Propellers & Drive Systems
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-03-2008, 16:24   #46
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Boat: GibSea 472
Posts: 520
I would be looking into some Perkins commercial diesel engines for that breed of Volvo engines.
Elie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2008, 20:40   #47
Moderator Emeritus
 
David M's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Boat: Research vessel for a university, retired now.
Posts: 10,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidLandOne View Post
So far no problems.

NOW I know am just tempting fate saying that .

For reasons I have never followed up on Yanmars do not seem to be popular choices for smaller commercial vessels here, whereas a lot of Volvos (or if not those then into the more expensive breeds).
Yanmars are not popular for commercial boats because they do not have longevity. Too many ponies are being squeezed out of too few cubic inches. This requires them to be run at higher RPM's in order to keep the weight down for the same horsepower. Small boats are much more weight sensitive and do not accumulate as many engine hours so it makes sense to put Yanmars on smaller pleasure boats. They are also less expensive for a given horsepower.

Caterpillars, Cummins, Detroit and to some degree now, John Deere are the more popular engines. The distribution network is also a big factor. Engines that are out of service cost commercial boats lots of money in lost revenues therefore reliability is a huge factor. Commercial engines are also generally run harder and have more engine hours per year than yacht engines. The difference comes down to durability and reliability.
__________________
David

Life begins where land ends.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 01:20   #48
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colombo
Posts: 1,059
Yes I believe you are likely correct David, although I haven't compared the rpms of equivalent Volvo and Yanmars. Made a point with our little Volvo to get a low revving one, ours is governed to max of somewhere around 2,800 rpm which is, of course, quite low for a reasonably modernish little 2 litre engine.

Probably the most popular engines for commercial vessels here in NZ are Caterpillar and MTU, and Volvo too for the planing lighter boats such as do fishing charters, etc.

Detroit Diesel have an excellent reputation but, of course, they in recent years went through contortions of combining product range with MTU in much of the world. Not many Cummins or John Deere here.

Don't think Detroit have been particularly well represented out here in recent years so not many in newer boats - just had a look on the local MTU/Detroit distributor's website and they don't seem to even list the venerable Detroits such as the Series 60 and give most space to the MTU side of the family. That I suspect because the land transport/industrial engine market is very small here but across the Tasman in Australia that is not the case, of course, with big mining industry, a lot of long haul trucking, etc.

John
MidLandOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
saildrive, service, volvo


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.