Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 25-01-2018, 10:31   #46
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Topsfield, MA
Boat: J42
Posts: 134
Images: 2
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

Not a good idea. Jordan conservatively suggests the chaiplates, bolts and backing structure needs to be strong enough to hoist the fully laden vessel. Would you feel safe hoisting your vessel from the aft end of the toerails?
Boston Blackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 10:53   #47
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Victoria BC
Boat: Rafiki 37
Posts: 1,390
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Blackie View Post
Not a good idea. Jordan conservatively suggests the chaiplates, bolts and backing structure needs to be strong enough to hoist the fully laden vessel. Would you feel safe hoisting your vessel from the aft end of the toerails?
Yes, I think so. Provided it was pulled from the back along the longitudinal direction and the attachment points were bolted longitudinally to the toe rail.

It's through-bolted through the aluminium and then the deck and then the hull, every 6 inches or so.
__________________
www.saildivefish.ca
alctel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 11:13   #48
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Topsfield, MA
Boat: J42
Posts: 134
Images: 2
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

We have the same aluminum toerail construction on our J42. Rod Johnstone does not suggest high loading such as preventers to the bolted toerails. What is the grade of your toerail throughbolts? In confused late storm seas you will not be just experiencing shear loads parallel to the toe rail. There will be maximal lateral inboard stress in the bridle leg the stern is slewed toward. This will be putting ALL the twisting load on the aftermost toerail throughbolt. When it shears you will unzip the rail from the deck.
Boston Blackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 11:14   #49
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Victoria BC
Boat: Rafiki 37
Posts: 1,390
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Blackie View Post
We have the same aluminum toerail construction on our J42. Rod Johnstone does not suggest high loading such as preventers to the bolted toerails. What is the grade of your toerail throughbolts? In confused late storm seas you will not be just experiencing shear loads parallel to the toe rail. There will be maximal lateral inboard stress in the bridle leg the stern is slewed toward. This will be putting ALL the twisting load on the aftermost toerail throughbolt. When it shears you will unzip the rail from the deck.
Hmm ok. Did you use stern mounted chainplates?
__________________
www.saildivefish.ca
alctel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 14:18   #50
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Topsfield, MA
Boat: J42
Posts: 134
Images: 2
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

Quote:
Originally Posted by alctel View Post
Hmm ok. Did you use stern mounted chainplates?
Yes, we did. Have posted a pic of ours separately. The key is that the ultimate God-Forbid load bends the plate in toward the hull. Also note our oval slot which allows the shackle to swivel. Off- axis loads derate shackle WLL significantly.
Boston Blackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 14:36   #51
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,765
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

The concern about zippering is valid, but remember that outward pull will be taken by the other bridle arm. Up or down is possible, though.

There is another important point here, though, and that is choosing the correct bridle length. In simple theory, longer is better, providing more turning force. In practice, that results in one leg taking the load every time the boat yaws, an it will. Every time the leg goes slack there is a shock load and the potential for chafe.

I don't suppose there is one answer to this question. 1:1 is too short, 2:1 seems practical, and 4:1 is probably too long.
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2018, 15:19   #52
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Topsfield, MA
Boat: J42
Posts: 134
Images: 2
Re: Jordan series Drogue Attachment

Hi Thinwater,

Our bridles are 30' double braid Dacron, according to Jordan's design. Overall length of the drogue is 300' in three cowhitched sections of decreasing diameter. I believe most of the stress is taken by the inward angled lead, given our transom beam. I did massively beef the internal laminate and added backing plates.

Cheers,
Blackie
Boston Blackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
drogue, men


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jordan Series Drogue vs Paratech Sea Anchor toelpel Seamanship & Boat Handling 114 26-11-2015 14:27
Jordan Series Drogue vs Para-Anchor ? markpj23 Health, Safety & Related Gear 5 30-10-2011 20:17
For Sale: Jordan Series Drogue Sirocco Classifieds Archive 8 15-07-2011 14:20
Carbon Fiber for Jordan Series Drouge Attachment thinwater Construction, Maintenance & Refit 6 06-11-2009 07:00

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:08.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.