Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 16-11-2019, 09:27   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 59
pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

I am planning on rerouting the jib sheets/furler sheet and main halyard to the cockpit. I have been planning on using blocks for the direction changes, but I am thinking I can use either pad eyes/fairleads. any thoughts on sheet wear thru a padeye/fairlead vs block? this will allow me to use fewer moving parts, which I think is almost always good, and have fewer new holes in deck. thanks again for feedback..bill
buddhadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 14:10   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,374
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

So long all the deflection angles are small, let’s say 10 degrees or less then fairleads are great. If the deflections are say 10 to 30 degrees, then something like a low friction ring is better ( typically a wider bend surface) than the typical fairlead. Deflection angles over like 60 degrees you start to think about moving sheaves, but it depends how much load and how frequently they are adjusted.
Breaking Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 14:21   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 59
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

thanks sounds like fairlead will be good for the jib furler. ive got a anywhere form prob 10-30 on the jib sheets. where do I find these low friction rings? pad eyes? ive got about a 45 degree turn on the main halyard. thanks and please advise again.. thanks bill
buddhadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 14:27   #4
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,374
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

Low friction rings: low friction rings-antal. I like antal, but several other brands make pretty much exact same. Don’t know where you are, so hard to suggest a specific source.

Main halyards usually are led with blocks/sheaves in order to reduce friction, make it easier to take reefs in and out.... but as always “it depends” but see deck organizers like https://www.harken.com/productcategory.aspx?taxid=1520
Breaking Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 14:37   #5
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 59
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

thanks, doesn't look like a huge difference between rings and fairleads, am I missing something? what about using a pad eye?
buddhadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 14:55   #6
Writing Full-Time Since 2014
 
thinwater's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Deale, MD
Boat: PDQ Altair, 32/34
Posts: 9,773
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddhadawg View Post
thanks, doesn't look like a huge difference between rings and fairleads, am I missing something? what about using a pad eye?

Pad eye = huge friction. They are really only for anchoring things.


Low friction rings work pretty well with Dyneema, but not so well with polyester.



But without knowing what boat and having some pics, we can't help much.
__________________
Gear Testing--Engineering--Sailing
https://sail-delmarva.blogspot.com/
thinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 15:03   #7
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 59
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

thanks thin water we have a 83 island trader re routing sheets over the salon as opposed to along the weatherdecks. sounds like sheaves should be the answer
buddhadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 15:06   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,374
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddhadawg View Post
thanks, doesn't look like a huge difference between rings and fairleads, am I missing something?

Between fairleads and rings ..... same general shape, but generally the fairleads are in smaller sizes with thus tighter bend which rings come in larger sizes with wider more general bends.

what about using a pad eye?

Usually not a great idea unless there is almost zero deflection with a quite small diameter line.
.............
Breaking Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 15:13   #9
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 59
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

thanks again, looks like sheaves will be the equipment of choice
buddhadawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 15:17   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,374
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

I think you could probably reasonably use fairleads or rings for the furling line, except perhaps if you have a point in the cockpit where it makes a big turn, then use a block just there.

The jib sheet and halyard, yea, sheaves are typically better.
Breaking Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 16:21   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Boat: 50’ Bavaria
Posts: 1,809
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

Yes, many boats use fairleads to lead the furling line along the toerail, then a block or low friction ring where it leaves the toerail to go to the winch (or sometimes, to a footblock next to the winch and then to the winch).
Tillsbury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2019, 19:24   #12
Registered User
 
Marathon1150's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Boat: Beneteau Idylle 1150
Posts: 682
Images: 13
Re: pad eyes/fairleads vs blocks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tillsbury View Post
Yes, many boats use fairleads to lead the furling line along the toerail, then a block or low friction ring where it leaves the toerail to go to the winch (or sometimes, to a footblock next to the winch and then to the winch).
One of the fairleads from the furler drum over the cabin top back to the cockpit pulled loose (it was poorly installed with wood screws rather than through-bolted) after 10 years of use. I re-routed the furling line as described in the quote above, using Harken stanchion blocks. This produced an amazing reduction in friction and made it much, much easier to furl the headsail. I wish I had done this 10 years ago. The only downside is that the Harken stanchion blocks are not cheap. We could put the furler line onto a winch but in my view on our boat (others may differ), if that is necessary there is something wrong and it would be a mistake to do so.

When we first bought Marathon, I moved the main halyard back to the cockpit using a block at the base of the mast, through a factory deck organizer and then through a rope clutch. I quickly learned that this added a lot of effort when we installed a new 9.9oz dacron mainsail which is quite heavy. I now do all of the main sail work at the mast - it is much easier, and the furling system requires being there anyway.
__________________
Desolation Island is situated in a third region, somewhere between elsewhere and everywhere.
Jean-Paul Kauffmann
Marathon1150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pad Eyes for Life Lines - Load Rating squarehead67 Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 15 12-11-2019 09:15
Advice on installing pad eyes. alaskaflyfish Product or Service Reviews & Evaluations 30 27-03-2016 21:05
For Sale: pad eyes idanno Classifieds Archive 6 06-05-2015 11:40
For Sale: Set of Four Wilcox Crittenden Bronze Diamond Pad Eyes mikeroddy Classifieds Archive 0 30-09-2014 15:55
What would these pad eyes be for? Akapeterc Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 18 02-04-2014 16:44

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 20:34.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.