Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 26-05-2013, 00:42   #16
Registered User
 
Snowpetrel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hobart
Boat: Alloy Peterson 40
Posts: 3,919
Ha andrew. Nice to see you endorsing the bridle idea . I also wonder if another appoach to spreading the load across a large area of toerail would be to make up two aluminium strips about 2 foot long that could be bolted through the toerail slots. They could either have nicely rounded holes for a spectra strop made. Or a decent lug bolted onto them for the preventer.
__________________
My Ramblings
Snowpetrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2013, 02:38   #17
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,441
Re: Toe Rail Tough Enough For Preventer?

Hi Ben

I thought it would be disrespectful not to tip my hat to your bridle idea (a conditional endorsement, if you read carefully :-)

until we'd arrived at some sort of understanding.

In principle, I continue to see it as a brilliant suggestion. It's often done on spi poles, as you will know, and they are pivoted at the inboard end, like a boom.

I did write a post for the thread where you suggested the idea, but my internet connection dropped and I lost it.

When i get a bit of spare time I'll try and recreate it. The gist was that if a truly 'mid' boom position (ie something close to L/2) is feasible (wide beam, short boom) I can see lots of merit.

However most toerail preventers have to attach (in the absence of a bridle) at about the vang attachment point, typically about L/3, and in that case, a bridle would have to be so compact that I question (for a metal boom) whether it would be worthwhile, given that the reinforcing would probably have to be longer in total than for a single tang point.

In my earlier post where I threw tepid water on the idea, I had initially written another para where I said that an isosceles (60 deg) bridle would perhaps be a good compromise, so it was good to see you independently making the same case.

I deleted it before posting because I didn't have time to work through all the load cases and implications, to reassure myself it was ready to go 'live on air'.

Reinforcing the toerail seems like another good option.
I would imagine you're thinking of maybe a "T" section?

I don't think flat bar - unless laid horizontally - would add enough resistance to bending to be worthwhile....
Andrew Troup is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:02.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.