Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Anchoring & Mooring
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-11-2015, 11:04   #46
Registered User
 
Muckle Flugga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aboard the Ocean wave
Boat: 55' sloop.
Posts: 1,426
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

I agree with Dockhead and CarlF about Lewmar. Despite their having produced some good kit in the past and still now, I have come to the point where I have some significant disdain for that company. Unless you know someone you can communicate with directly on a personal basis on the "inside" (as I now do) I and others have found them incommunicative, rather high handed, slow to react to orders, and with many, perhaps deliberate, design flaws. Why deliberate? Well for one thing they INSIST on using aluminium in conjunction with mild steel, bronze and stainless in their machines, be it winches or windlasses; and for critical components. These almost ALWAYS corrode, as you might expect, being bolted into a perfect battery configuration. As Dockhead suggests you cannot purchase these corroded parts individually but must repurchase the entire assemblage. In the case of the winches the parts in question are the bases, which in the case of powered winches frequently corrode around the seal housing, rendering the whole useless. In the case of their vertical windlasses, the "basket" which separates the gearbox from the underdeck, and through which passes the spline shaft, is always aluminium and nearly always corrodes severely. In some cases I have known them to corrode to nothing at all and finally snap off in the middle, dropping the windlass motor an gear assembly to the floor of its housing to the astonishment of the boat's owner (not boats I was working on at the time, but ones I have been asked to help). Of course regular maintenance helps. But believe me on boats I have worked on, and my own, I check and service (including motor disassembly and cleaning) thoroughly on a regular basis (bi annually usually) and use corrosion inhibitor on all parts. It makes little real difference. To the poster above who has said that they have had good operation for the past two years… beware: check the basket carefully for signs of corrosion, especially right under the deck, as it is likely turning to cheese without you realising it. Usually this process takes 3 to 5 years to become really noticeable or critical. And can you buy the "basket" as a consumable? Can you hell. As Dockhead says you have to buy the ENTIRE windlass again, including the perfectly serviceable above deck parts. I can think of a good reason for this policy, but it is not a pretty one! Attached is an exemplar photo of the corrosion of the basket of one such windlass I took recently. In this case the windlass is around 5 years old.

LEWMAR: if you are a Lewmar employee or director and are reading this: PLEASE TAKE NOTE! This policy is damaging the reputation of your company and indeed it is frankly unreasonable and unfair to clients. I have raised this issue with you directly on numerous occasions and have found you to be thoroughly unresponsive.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0533.jpg
Views:	193
Size:	410.3 KB
ID:	112054  
__________________
‘Structural engineering is the art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyse as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess in such a way that the public at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.’
Muckle Flugga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 12:54   #47
Registered User
 
UNCIVILIZED's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Up the mast, looking for clean wind.
Boat: Currently Shopping, & Heavily in LUST!
Posts: 5,629
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

The Maxwell VW Series has several things going for it, aside from their good reliability record, for like half a century.
- You can run the capstan & gypsy independently of each other
- You can use the capstan as a power winch, for all kinds of chores
- It can be mounted so that the motor is NOT in the chain locker, & thus isn't subject to salt spray & or submersion
- It has the option of various remotes, so it's operable from spots besides the foredeck
__________________

The Uncommon Thing, The Hard Thing, The Important Thing (in Life): Making Promises to Yourself, And Keeping Them.
UNCIVILIZED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 13:44   #48
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: WY / Currently in Hayes VA on the Chesapeake
Boat: Ocean Alexander, Ocean 44
Posts: 1,149
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckle Flugga View Post
I agree with Dockhead and CarlF about Lewmar. Despite their having produced some good kit in the past and still now, I have come to the point where I have some significant disdain for that company. Unless you know someone you can communicate with directly on a personal basis on the "inside" (as I now do) I and others have found them incommunicative, rather high handed, slow to react to orders, and with many, perhaps deliberate, design flaws. Why deliberate? Well for one thing they INSIST on using aluminium in conjunction with mild steel, bronze and stainless in their machines, be it winches or windlasses; and for critical components. These almost ALWAYS corrode, as you might expect, being bolted into a perfect battery configuration. As Dockhead suggests you cannot purchase these corroded parts individually but must repurchase the entire assemblage. In the case of the winches the parts in question are the bases, which in the case of powered winches frequently corrode around the seal housing, rendering the whole useless. In the case of their vertical windlasses, the "basket" which separates the gearbox from the underdeck, and through which passes the spline shaft, is always aluminium and nearly always corrodes severely. In some cases I have known them to corrode to nothing at all and finally snap off in the middle, dropping the windlass motor an gear assembly to the floor of its housing to the astonishment of the boat's owner (not boats I was working on at the time, but ones I have been asked to help). Of course regular maintenance helps. But believe me on boats I have worked on, and my own, I check and service (including motor disassembly and cleaning) thoroughly on a regular basis (bi annually usually) and use corrosion inhibitor on all parts. It makes little real difference. To the poster above who has said that they have had good operation for the past two years… beware: check the basket carefully for signs of corrosion, especially right under the deck, as it is likely turning to cheese without you realising it. Usually this process takes 3 to 5 years to become really noticeable or critical. And can you buy the "basket" as a consumable? Can you hell. As Dockhead says you have to buy the ENTIRE windlass again, including the perfectly serviceable above deck parts. I can think of a good reason for this policy, but it is not a pretty one! Attached is an exemplar photo of the corrosion of the basket of one such windlass I took recently. In this case the windlass is around 5 years old.

LEWMAR: if you are a Lewmar employee or director and are reading this: PLEASE TAKE NOTE! This policy is damaging the reputation of your company and indeed it is frankly unreasonable and unfair to clients. I have raised this issue with you directly on numerous occasions and have found you to be thoroughly unresponsive.
Take that to any good machine shop and have them make one. If it is aluminum you can buy a chunk of rod for less than $70. My guy took less than an hour of machine work. It would take more time if it is steel. In steel it may make more sense to get a length of tube and weld the flanges on.

If they think it is for a farm machine it will probably cost less. )
darylat8750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 14:48   #49
Registered User
 
UNCIVILIZED's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Up the mast, looking for clean wind.
Boat: Currently Shopping, & Heavily in LUST!
Posts: 5,629
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckle Flugga View Post
I agree with Dockhead and CarlF about Lewmar. Despite their having produced some good kit in the past and still now, I have come to the point where I have some significant disdain for that company. Unless you know someone you can communicate with directly on a personal basis on the "inside" (as I now do) I and others have found them incommunicative, rather high handed, slow to react to orders, and with many, perhaps deliberate, design flaws. Why deliberate? Well for one thing they INSIST on using aluminium in conjunction with mild steel, bronze and stainless in their machines, be it winches or windlasses; and for critical components. These almost ALWAYS corrode, as you might expect, being bolted into a perfect battery configuration. As Dockhead suggests you cannot purchase these corroded parts individually but must repurchase the entire assemblage. In the case of the winches the parts in question are the bases, which in the case of powered winches frequently corrode around the seal housing, rendering the whole useless. In the case of their vertical windlasses, the "basket" which separates the gearbox from the underdeck, and through which passes the spline shaft, is always aluminium and nearly always corrodes severely. In some cases I have known them to corrode to nothing at all and finally snap off in the middle, dropping the windlass motor an gear assembly to the floor of its housing to the astonishment of the boat's owner (not boats I was working on at the time, but ones I have been asked to help). Of course regular maintenance helps. But believe me on boats I have worked on, and my own, I check and service (including motor disassembly and cleaning) thoroughly on a regular basis (bi annually usually) and use corrosion inhibitor on all parts. It makes little real difference. To the poster above who has said that they have had good operation for the past two years… beware: check the basket carefully for signs of corrosion, especially right under the deck, as it is likely turning to cheese without you realising it. Usually this process takes 3 to 5 years to become really noticeable or critical. And can you buy the "basket" as a consumable? Can you hell. As Dockhead says you have to buy the ENTIRE windlass again, including the perfectly serviceable above deck parts. I can think of a good reason for this policy, but it is not a pretty one! Attached is an exemplar photo of the corrosion of the basket of one such windlass I took recently. In this case the windlass is around 5 years old.

LEWMAR: if you are a Lewmar employee or director and are reading this: PLEASE TAKE NOTE! This policy is damaging the reputation of your company and indeed it is frankly unreasonable and unfair to clients. I have raised this issue with you directly on numerous occasions and have found you to be thoroughly unresponsive.
+X You guys are FAR from the only ones on this. I deal a lot with deck hardware, from the standpoint of outfitting/re-fitting racing boats from time to time. And in re-fitting cruisers, also. And the number of Lewmar blocks which I've seen fail at a small fraction of their rated load is rediculous. Plus, I've heard more tales along the same lines than I can count.

That, & getting quality customer service, even when I'd take the time to call the UK from the US, even 10-20yrs ago, when it wassn't cheap to do so, was like pulling teeth.
Yet, when I ring up, say, Harken, they're always happy to help, & plenty of times have gone above & beyond what I or anyone would expect, based on what was asked of them.
The kind of service which keeps one going back to a company time & again.
Also, I've compartively beat the crap out of Harken's deck gear, & at the end of the day, usually all it wants for is routine TLC.

When it comes to windlasses, I get the same vibe from Maxwell. Although, frankly, on all of the boats I've worked on, all that I've ever had to do to a Maxwell, fell under the header of routine service. Almost regardless of how they'd been treated.
Although, like a nice car (BMW, Lexus, etc.) if you have a nice piece of hardware like a Maxwell, you're likely to give it that little bit extra TLC because, as goofy as it sounds, you love it (a little or a lot). And want to be able to depend on it at Zero Dark Thirty, when everything else has gone to crap.

Thus endeth the sermon
__________________

The Uncommon Thing, The Hard Thing, The Important Thing (in Life): Making Promises to Yourself, And Keeping Them.
UNCIVILIZED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 15:22   #50
Registered User
 
Stu Jackson's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cowichan Bay, BC (Maple Bay Marina)
Posts: 9,736
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCIVILIZED View Post
+X You guys are FAR from the only ones on this. I deal a lot with deck hardware, from the standpoint of outfitting/re-fitting racing boats from time to time. And in re-fitting cruisers, also. And the number of Lewmar blocks which I've seen fail at a small fraction of their rated load is rediculous. Plus, I've heard more tales along the same lines than I can count.
Good sermon!

I have had horrible experience with Lewmar blocks. Cheeks rotted away after less than two years.

Twice.

Crap stuff.

Replaced with Garhauer. All my OEM and replacement Garhauer stock is in perfect condition, anywhere from 30 to 16 years later.

Geez, who woulda thought...
__________________
Stu Jackson
Catalina 34 #224 (1986) C34IA Secretary
Cowichan Bay, BC, SR/FK, M25, Rocna 10 (22#) (NZ model)
Stu Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 19:07   #51
Registered User
 
Muckle Flugga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aboard the Ocean wave
Boat: 55' sloop.
Posts: 1,426
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by darylat8750 View Post
Take that to any good machine shop and have them make one. If it is aluminum you can buy a chunk of rod for less than $70. My guy took less than an hour of machine work. It would take more time if it is steel. In steel it may make more sense to get a length of tube and weld the flanges on.

If they think it is for a farm machine it will probably cost less. )
My thoughts exactly and already. I have one in process with a superb machinist for this very unit.
__________________
‘Structural engineering is the art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyse as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess in such a way that the public at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.’
Muckle Flugga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 19:11   #52
Registered User
 
Muckle Flugga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aboard the Ocean wave
Boat: 55' sloop.
Posts: 1,426
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCIVILIZED View Post
+X You guys are FAR from the only ones on this. I deal a lot with deck hardware, from the standpoint of outfitting/re-fitting racing boats from time to time. And in re-fitting cruisers, also. And the number of Lewmar blocks which I've seen fail at a small fraction of their rated load is rediculous. Plus, I've heard more tales along the same lines than I can count.

That, & getting quality customer service, even when I'd take the time to call the UK from the US, even 10-20yrs ago, when it wassn't cheap to do so, was like pulling teeth.
Yet, when I ring up, say, Harken, they're always happy to help, & plenty of times have gone above & beyond what I or anyone would expect, based on what was asked of them.
The kind of service which keeps one going back to a company time & again.
Also, I've compartively beat the crap out of Harken's deck gear, & at the end of the day, usually all it wants for is routine TLC.

When it comes to windlasses, I get the same vibe from Maxwell. Although, frankly, on all of the boats I've worked on, all that I've ever had to do to a Maxwell, fell under the header of routine service. Almost regardless of how they'd been treated.
Although, like a nice car (BMW, Lexus, etc.) if you have a nice piece of hardware like a Maxwell, you're likely to give it that little bit extra TLC because, as goofy as it sounds, you love it (a little or a lot). And want to be able to depend on it at Zero Dark Thirty, when everything else has gone to crap.

Thus endeth the sermon
+5 Yes to all.
__________________
‘Structural engineering is the art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyse as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess in such a way that the public at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.’
Muckle Flugga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 20:21   #53
Registered User
 
Matt Johnson's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Annapolis MD
Boat: Building a Max Cruise 44 hybrid electric cat
Posts: 3,246
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckle Flugga View Post
I agree with Dockhead and CarlF about Lewmar. Despite their having produced some good kit in the past and still now, I have come to the point where I have some significant disdain for that company. Unless you know someone you can communicate with directly on a personal basis on the "inside" (as I now do) I and others have found them incommunicative, rather high handed, slow to react to orders, and with many, perhaps deliberate, design flaws. Why deliberate? Well for one thing they INSIST on using aluminium in conjunction with mild steel, bronze and stainless in their machines, be it winches or windlasses; and for critical components. These almost ALWAYS corrode, as you might expect, being bolted into a perfect battery configuration. As Dockhead suggests you cannot purchase these corroded parts individually but must repurchase the entire assemblage. In the case of the winches the parts in question are the bases, which in the case of powered winches frequently corrode around the seal housing, rendering the whole useless. In the case of their vertical windlasses, the "basket" which separates the gearbox from the underdeck, and through which passes the spline shaft, is always aluminium and nearly always corrodes severely. In some cases I have known them to corrode to nothing at all and finally snap off in the middle, dropping the windlass motor an gear assembly to the floor of its housing to the astonishment of the boat's owner (not boats I was working on at the time, but ones I have been asked to help). Of course regular maintenance helps. But believe me on boats I have worked on, and my own, I check and service (including motor disassembly and cleaning) thoroughly on a regular basis (bi annually usually) and use corrosion inhibitor on all parts. It makes little real difference. To the poster above who has said that they have had good operation for the past two years… beware: check the basket carefully for signs of corrosion, especially right under the deck, as it is likely turning to cheese without you realising it. Usually this process takes 3 to 5 years to become really noticeable or critical. And can you buy the "basket" as a consumable? Can you hell. As Dockhead says you have to buy the ENTIRE windlass again, including the perfectly serviceable above deck parts. I can think of a good reason for this policy, but it is not a pretty one! Attached is an exemplar photo of the corrosion of the basket of one such windlass I took recently. In this case the windlass is around 5 years old.

LEWMAR: if you are a Lewmar employee or director and are reading this: PLEASE TAKE NOTE! This policy is damaging the reputation of your company and indeed it is frankly unreasonable and unfair to clients. I have raised this issue with you directly on numerous occasions and have found you to be thoroughly unresponsive.
What is Maxwell's "basket" / gearbox made of? My Lofrans Progress 1000 looks just like my old Lewmar Concept 1 windlass... aluminum gearbox with a black finish as shown in your photo. I didn't know anyone made a gear box in anything but aluminum. Also, don't they all have mild steel motor housings? The only difference I have seen is Quick's plastic cased motor and gearbox.

Matt


Edit: Just checked Maxwell's site. Seems they use anodized aluminum for their vertical windlass gearbox too. Coatings may be better on some brands, but the base component's material seem to be the same.
__________________
MJSailing - Youtube Vlog -
Matt Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 02:02   #54
Moderator
 
Dockhead's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denmark (Winter), Cruising North Sea and Baltic (Summer)
Boat: Cutter-Rigged Moody 54
Posts: 34,468
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by funjohnson View Post
What is Maxwell's "basket" / gearbox made of? My Lofrans Progress 1000 looks just like my old Lewmar Concept 1 windlass... aluminum gearbox with a black finish as shown in your photo. I didn't know anyone made a gear box in anything but aluminum. Also, don't they all have mild steel motor housings? The only difference I have seen is Quick's plastic cased motor and gearbox.

Matt


Edit: Just checked Maxwell's site. Seems they use anodized aluminum for their vertical windlass gearbox too. Coatings may be better on some brands, but the base component's material seem to be the same.
The coating can be all the difference.


Sent from my D6633 using Cruisers Sailing Forum mobile app
__________________
"You sea! I resign myself to you also . . . . I guess what you mean,
I behold from the beach your crooked inviting fingers,
I believe you refuse to go back without feeling of me;
We must have a turn together . . . . I undress . . . . hurry me out of sight of the land,
Cushion me soft . . . . rock me in billowy drowse,
Dash me with amorous wet . . . . I can repay you."
Walt Whitman
Dockhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 15:17   #55
Registered User
 
Scout 30's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Boat: Scout 30
Posts: 3,112
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

I'm trying to install a used Lofrans Tigress in place of my Simpson Lawrence Anchorman & could use some help. The Anchorman motor only has 2 terminals & the Tigress motor has 3, 1 positive for up, 1 positive for down & the ground. I have a reversing solenoid with only 2 output wires. Can I use my reversing solenoid with the Tigress? I'm thinking running a line to from each of the solenoid outputs to the 2 positive terminals on the motor & attaching a ground line from the ground in terminal of the solenoid coming from the battery. Or should I not run a ground to the solenoid at all & just run it straight to the windlass?
Scout 30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 15:26   #56
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York
Boat: LeComte NorthEast 38
Posts: 499
New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Dockhead: lighthouse 1501 horizontal windlass has the motor under decks like normal vertical windlasses. Does that bother you? Ideal is all above deck, so are most other horizontal ones, but not the lighthouse.
antoha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 15:45   #57
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oregon
Boat: Seafarer36c
Posts: 5,563
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockhead View Post
The coating can be all the difference.


Sent from my D6633 using Cruisers Sailing Forum mobile app
The coating on the Lofrans Project 1000/1500 is sub standard. Any water that leaks down around the shaft collects at the top of the gearbox and rots it out. There are drain holes but it corrodes away anyway. Pretty much a pos.
model 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2015, 02:16   #58
Registered User
 
Muckle Flugga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aboard the Ocean wave
Boat: 55' sloop.
Posts: 1,426
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by funjohnson View Post
What is Maxwell's "basket" / gearbox made of? My Lofrans Progress 1000 looks just like my old Lewmar Concept 1 windlass... aluminum gearbox with a black finish as shown in your photo. I didn't know anyone made a gear box in anything but aluminum. Also, don't they all have mild steel motor housings? The only difference I have seen is Quick's plastic cased motor and gearbox.

Matt


Edit: Just checked Maxwell's site. Seems they use anodized aluminum for their vertical windlass gearbox too. Coatings may be better on some brands, but the base component's material seem to be the same.
The older model Ideals are all steel and bronze. In any case, here's the fix for that crappy aluminium "basket" idea. Got the technical go ahead from my Lewmar insider. The old one is next to the unit, and the yellow crud is fresh corrosion inhibitor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0648.jpg
Views:	309
Size:	404.1 KB
ID:	112596  
__________________
‘Structural engineering is the art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyse as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess in such a way that the public at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.’
Muckle Flugga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2015, 02:55   #59
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Hello Muckel Flugger

I am sorry to see that you have had issue getting in contact with a Lewmar

representative and i would like to offer my advice and services. i am a member of the Lewmar technical support team and we have a dedicated email for just this reason.

I will be happy to help with any and all questions sent to me at,

techsupport@lewmar.com

there are a team of us happy to help and one the needs advise or has any questions.



Lewmar Support is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2015, 03:07   #60
Registered User
 
Muckle Flugga's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aboard the Ocean wave
Boat: 55' sloop.
Posts: 1,426
Re: New Windlass: Lewmar, Maxwell, Lofrans Or?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewmar Support View Post
Hello Muckel Flugger

I am sorry to see that you have had issue getting in contact with a Lewmar

representative and i would like to offer my advice and services. i am a member of the Lewmar technical support team and we have a dedicated email for just this reason.

I will be happy to help with any and all questions sent to me at,

techsupport@lewmar.com

there are a team of us happy to help and one the needs advise or has any questions.



Well that's a turn up for the books! For a start, you can have a think about your policy of whole assembly replacement for the failure of a single engineered part, particularly one which so regularly fails. This being the basket on your vertical windlasses. Forcing customers to junk, store or sell as spares all the other components merely due to the (common) failure of this one component is really a bad policy, and has led to bad feeling on my part and on the parts of others I have known, and indeed others on this thread. However your public contact here is definitely a step in the right direction with regard to customer service. Though it's "Muckle Flugga"
__________________
‘Structural engineering is the art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyse as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess in such a way that the public at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.’
Muckle Flugga is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lewmar, lofrans, maxwell, wind, windlass


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windlass Trouble or Blessing? Lewmar, maxwell, lofrans jdisarro Anchoring & Mooring 2 16-12-2013 20:13
New Windlass ... Maxwell HRC-10??? kevball Anchoring & Mooring 11 13-09-2012 14:48
For Sale: Maxwell VWC 1500 12v windlass near new cat man do Classifieds Archive 4 28-08-2012 13:52
Lewmar vs Lofrans vs Maxwell kevball Anchoring & Mooring 3 23-02-2012 22:17
Advice on Windlass: Maxwell or Lofrans rcmpegasus Anchoring & Mooring 2 12-08-2011 09:34

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:25.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.