Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Anchoring & Mooring
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-08-2020, 08:26   #16
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike OReilly View Post
Beat me to it . All independent testing I've seen shows these "new-gen" anchors outperform most older-style across the board. This also coincides with most anecdotal evidence, as well as my own experience.
Same here. When I first put a Rocna on my boat when I backed down to set the anchor I learned very quickly to take ALL the slack out of the rode first. Otherwise you risk snatching the windlass off the deck.

I might add that one should emphasize "independent" testing. I've seen results published in a number of sources that were performed by several different groups all of which had no connection with any of the anchor manufacturers.

Another point I think all agree on, the most holding power by weight and probably by size as well is the Fortress anchor. Also fantastic customer support. The only downside, they don't reset as reliably as the new gen anchors when the pull is reversed.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:30   #17
Registered User
 
Lost Horizons's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Boat: Island Packet 349
Posts: 671
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingssail View Post

The boats sail less well with the excess weight on the bow
Why? I think it is the opposite. Depends on the degree of excess, off course, but if the design waterline plane is parallel to the water surface, why would the boats sail “less well”?
Lost Horizons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:38   #18
Registered User
 
Lost Horizons's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Boat: Island Packet 349
Posts: 671
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipmac View Post
the Fortress anchor. Also fantastic customer support.
Not in my experience. I sent an inquiry to their technical support a few months ago and never heard back. I would call it a lack of customer support.
Lost Horizons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:50   #19
Registered User
 
Cheechako's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Skagit City, WA
Posts: 25,655
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

I had the 44 Delta on a 42 cat and it worked well. So I would guess the 55 is about right for that boat. Of course, when it comes to anchoring, bigger is always better, but bigger is heavier too. 85# seems vast overkill to me. Especially if it's supposedly a better anchor!

I don't remember the Delta coming loose throughout the E Caribe. UNLESS the wind clocked 180, then the Delta would come loose. A fault of that particular, and many actually , anchors. I would dive the anchor a lot, and in sand it would often completely disappear under the sand if the wind was blowing.
__________________
"I spent most of my money on Booze, Broads and Boats. The rest I wasted" - Elmore Leonard











Cheechako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:50   #20
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 45
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Thanks for all the responses. I tend to agree that the Cat manufacturer just gave an anchor for day use and it is not really intended for the cruiser that anchors overnight regularly.
I will go with the bigger mantus.
mcneilms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:55   #21
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,639
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Manufacturers like the Delta because it's cheap, people are used to it, and it fits just about all rollers. I suffered through one for about 5 years before the new gen anchors came out. My previous boat's CQR held better.

I have no doubt that a 55lb Manson, Rocna, Spade, or Mantus would set better than the 55lb Delta - as would a 85lb of any of them.

When you used to have to lift an anchor by hand, getting by with a small anchor was often necessary for your back. As your boat likely has a windlass, there's no reason not to go with a big anchor. Pushing the windlass button doesn't get any harder.

If you are worried about extra 30lbs of weight in the bow of a cat, use a little less chain, use a smaller size G4 chain and/or have the 2nd anchor be very light (aluminum Spade or Fortress) and stored aft. You'll hardly ever use it except to row out in the dinghy to set as a kedge anchor.
CarlF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:55   #22
Registered User
 
Mike OReilly's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Good question
Boat: Rafiki 37
Posts: 14,386
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingssail View Post
I guess I'd like to read a couple of these tests, searching on this forum for "anchor holding test" came up with nothing, and internet search came up with one west marine test.

Do you know of some?
CF's own Panope is a great source:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy1...fcf4asEG_bulHA

Practical Sailor has been doing tests for decades. I'm not longer a subscriber, but when I was you could access all the archives.

Here's a random selection of hits that come up when you search "yacht anchor test"
And then there are the endless tests done by manufacturers. These are taken with a grain of sand, although comparing them across the board will give useful data.

There's lots out there, plus all the anecdotal evidence in the cruising community.

BTW, I should have added that the one 'older style' anchor which continues to show its worth is the Danforth/Fortress. These consistently produce the highest holding forces. HOWEVER, this is in a more narrow set of substrate; typically firm mud to sand. This is why most cruisers who anchor in a wide variety of bottoms don't usually use this style of anchor as their main bower. But most of us do carry one (or more).
__________________
Why go fast, when you can go slow.
BLOG: www.helplink.com/CLAFC
Mike OReilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 09:28   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD
Boat: Gozzard, 44CC, 50'
Posts: 561
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

After 20 years with another style anchor I switched to the Mantus. I have never experienced a more secure anchoring experience on any other ground tackle on numerous other boats than I had with the Mantus. Some times anchoring in strong tidal areas with strong wind and it rotated and reset almost within the shank length. We're 16 tons and never dragged. Sound anchors provide sound sleep. If they say 85 then I'd strongly urge you to get that size. Be prepared to hold on when you deploy it cause it will stop you like you were tied to a piling. JMHO
Scrimshaw4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 09:39   #24
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Currently cruising the eastern Caribbean
Boat: Lagoon 42, Minx
Posts: 345
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Bigger is generally better, but make sure your windlass can handle the extra weight.
singlespeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 09:43   #25
Registered User
 
SV__Grace's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: Nauticat 43 ketch
Posts: 794
Images: 5
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

The manufacturer needs to provide an anchor with a new boat as a safety regulation. Most seem to go for lunch-hook sized Deltas. The higher end manufacturers often upgrade to stainless steel anchors. No self respecting, knowledgable cruiser would want either of those and would immediately replace them.

I think of these anchors as "placeholders" as they have to put something there and they can't predict what a new owner would want or need.

Why they don't provide new owners an option to choose the anchor they want is a mystery to me, it's not a big expense considering the final price tag of a new boat. Personally I'd rather pay a few hundred more than have to replace and get rid of a useless anchor.
SV__Grace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 09:45   #26
Marine Service Provider
 
Izikalvo's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mediterranean
Boat: Jeanneau 43DS
Posts: 165
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Stick with the anchor manufacturer guidelines, not many have holding power values but all gives you the size and weight of the boat you should consider.
Izikalvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 10:31   #27
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingssail View Post
I guess I'd like to read a couple of these tests, searching on this forum for "anchor holding test" came up with nothing, and internet search came up with one west marine test.

Do you know of some?
Practical Sailor has done a series of anchor tests under different conditions, different bottom types, etc.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 10:36   #28
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Horizons View Post
Not in my experience. I sent an inquiry to their technical support a few months ago and never heard back. I would call it a lack of customer support.
Certainly based on your experience I could not disagree. My experience was the opposite. Bought a used Fortress that came without the mud attachments. Called Fortress to buy the parts and they promptly sent them to me at no charge. Have heard several similar comments over the years from other forum members. Maybe they just don't like people from Seattle.

I believe one of the principals from Fortress is on this forum. Maybe send them a PM.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 10:47   #29
Senior Cruiser
 
skipmac's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 29° 49.16’ N 82° 25.82’ W
Boat: Pearson 422
Posts: 16,306
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Horizons View Post
Why? I think it is the opposite. Depends on the degree of excess, off course, but if the design waterline plane is parallel to the water surface, why would the boats sail “less well”?
Putting weight in the ends of the boat increases the moment of inertia meaning as the bow or stern moves up or down on a wave the inertia of the mass in the ends of the boat want to continue moving up or down even after the wave passes by. The effect is commonly referred to as hobby horsing.

I had a 34' boat with a large anchor and a smaller backup on the bow and a lazarette on the stern with a small portable generator, the propane tanks, spare oil, gas and a few odds and ends. So a lot of weight in both ends of the boat. Most of the time I never noticed any negative effects but close hauled in short, steep waves the boat would pitch like mad. The bow would rise up to the peak of the wave and keep on rising after the wave passed like it had been launched off a ski ramp. Then it would come crashing down into the trough with a bang, the mast would slam forward and all the rigging would shake. Certain combinations of waves and point of sail it was borderline dangerous.
__________________
The water is always bluer on the other side of the ocean.
Sometimes it's necessary to state the obvious for the benefit of the oblivious.
Rust is the poor man's Loctite.
skipmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 10:59   #30
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Matthews NC
Boat: 2007 Gemini105mc 34ft
Posts: 35
Re: Replacement Anchor much larger than Factory

Hi. Google Panope anchor tests Lot of information there!
Have a great day!
Gaylyn Windriven 2007 105mc 971
GBonjour is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
anchor, men


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Installing larger Seacocks, how to dril the larger hole mike_kelly Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 56 21-05-2019 06:53
Will a larger battery bank maintain voltage level better than a single battery? Privilege Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 43 26-09-2018 10:10
How much is too much (anchor and chain) ArmySailor Anchoring & Mooring 84 04-07-2018 11:25
Refitting - Better than Factory Danosimp3 Monohull Sailboats 34 18-06-2012 10:01
Value Price So Much Lower than Asking Price rkrafter Dollars & Cents 21 05-03-2011 20:47

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.