Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-10-2008, 17:53   #16
Moderator Emeritus
 
Pblais's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hayes, VA
Boat: Gozzard 36
Posts: 8,700
Images: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Pblais
OK, it could be worse. It sounds like the basics are all behind you. Things that add to the mix include a Battery Monitor. They can measure the amps used and the current amp load. With information like that you have a real battery fuel gage. Think about adding something like that to the system. It lets you see what the load is and what the amp recharge is (when charging). If you know the in's and the out's you can read the integral in your head. Calculus never got so easy when you have real life in the cross hairs.

Now the batteries are like the fuel in the tank! Way cool stuff these battery monitors.
__________________
Paul Blais
s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36
37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W
Pblais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 18:45   #17
Registered User
 
Strygaldwir's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Boat: Privilege 37
Posts: 1,037
Images: 5
I keep on reviewing charging lifes of AGM vs FLA. It seems like on the whole FLA's support a higher number of charging cycles in comparison to AGM's.
Strygaldwir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 04:34   #18
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fremantle Australia
Boat: Schioning 12.3 "Wilderness" Bi-Rig under construction
Posts: 550
Send a message via Skype™ to Whimsical
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wotname View Post
  • Both will fail early if left dischaged (or partially discharged) for any length of time
Goeff
From what I have read the AGM is far more sensitive to being left in a slightly discharged state than the FLA is.
Do you still have contacts for NiCads that have been swapped out,usually at about half life, why not use them.

Mike
Whimsical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2008, 04:52   #19
Moderator Emeritus
 
Pblais's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hayes, VA
Boat: Gozzard 36
Posts: 8,700
Images: 15
Send a message via Skype™ to Pblais
Quote:
I keep on reviewing charging lifes of AGM vs FLA. It seems like on the whole FLA's support a higher number of charging cycles in comparison to AGM's.
The otherside is it takes more input to recharge a flood battery due to higher internal resitence. The accptance rate is higher and they wate less of the input energy. AGM's are cheaper to to own if you have to pay to recharge them like from your alternator for example.
__________________
Paul Blais
s/v Bright Eyes Gozzard 36
37 15.7 N 76 28.9 W
Pblais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 19:08   #20
Registered User
 
Caribsailors's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in the Caribbean
Boat: Beneteau First 38
Posts: 313
Images: 23
Perfect Thread

Thanks Wotname... I'm in the midst of redoing my battery, charger, monitor systems.

I have installed a Xantrex XC 3 bank charger with temp sensor on house bank.
I have FINALLY installed a Link20 battery monitor, I tried to get the CruzPro.

Anyway now for the batteries..... from my research and reading, I have decided to go with four 6volt AGM's in a series parallel configuration for the house because of the AH of the 6's compared to 2- 4D's along with weight and space.

For the start battery is where I'm waffling, I haven't decide on another two 6's or one 12v. AGM also

Thanks for everyones input... great reading it has put the gears in the noggin turning

Cheers
__________________
As I sit, a swirling sea of passion gives it's poems in waves underneath me.
The whispers of the sun in my eyes, a silence within.
Rhythm of the surf, drums of the sea. Thoughts tumble and toss about the deep blue abyss inside me, where the love of you dwells.
I'm fighting currents to get back to you, listening to the flow of your liquid language as you beckon me, "Come Play"
Mariners Cove, CI. Anonymous.
Caribsailors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 19:19   #21
CF Adviser
 
Pelagic's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Boat: Van Helleman Schooner 65ft StarGazer
Posts: 10,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whimsical View Post
From what I have read the AGM is far more sensitive to being left in a slightly discharged state than the FLA is.
Mike

Where did you read that Mike, cause I have read the opposite that "stratification" is not an issue for AGM's

Nick
Pelagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 20:09   #22
Eternal Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,046
Images: 4
Coupla data points:

1. AGMs are currently about three times the price of FLAs; and
2. AGM longevity (in "life cycles") is highly dependent on average depth-of-discharge (DoD).

If you contemplate using batteries in an application where they will be routinely discharged to more than about 50-60%, you're likely better off with FLAs as they will produce a greater number of useful cycles. And, of course, they're 1/3 the price to begin with.

Typical AGM specifications for a 40% DoD, however, are about 1,500 cycles. Pretty good!

However, if it's both cycles and ability to be deeply discharged you're looking for, it's hard to beat the Rolls/Surette batteries. These FLA designs -- which are costly -- typically last over 10 years, way past the likely longevity of AGMs.

It's true that both AGM and FLA batteries deteriorate if left for long at less than a full charge (due mostly to sulfation, not stratification). However, AGMs have a much lower self-discharge rate, so you might be better off with them if you contemplate leaving the batteries unattended and not on a charger for substantial periods of time.

Newer, better technologies are in the wings (and are even now available on a limited basis to military and some industrial users). We can only hope that they'll be available on the general market in a year or two.

Meanwhile, FLAs are definitely the price-point technology. But, AGMs have a great deal of appeal for some situations, too.

Bill
btrayfors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 00:17   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fremantle Australia
Boat: Schioning 12.3 "Wilderness" Bi-Rig under construction
Posts: 550
Send a message via Skype™ to Whimsical
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelagic View Post
Where did you read that Mike, cause I have read the opposite that "stratification" is not an issue for AGM's

Nick
Theres been some posts, here I think, where agm's have died a premature death and the feedback from the manufacturers was that they must be bought back to a full state of charge. Operating them between 50 and 90% kills them quick.

Mike
Whimsical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 06:13   #24
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Boat: SAnta Cruz 27
Posts: 6,903
The nice thing about gel batteries is that you can operate them partially discharged without losing capacity. For your boat, I'd recommend a 75 ah gel starting battery and a 200 ah house battery. Cost is about the same as the AGM's.
donradcliffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
battery


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battery selection and charging mestrezat Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 18 08-07-2008 21:03
Windlass selection question jack & lola Anchoring & Mooring 7 08-05-2008 07:34
Battery/Charger Question JusDreaming Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 4 23-09-2007 11:48
Battery Question Ativa Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 37 21-05-2007 08:30
Basic Battery Question ssullivan Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 7 18-09-2005 18:34

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.