Cruisers Forum
 


Closed Thread
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-09-2018, 11:18   #481
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,245
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SV THIRD DAY View Post
Then your antidotal stories are Cruisers with bad systems that tells absolutely nothing about holding plates in general nor their efficiency.

We sure hope you're bad assumptions that you're making on holding plates doesn't carry over into your quote "knowledge of lithium battery systems"... but then again it's an internet chat room
the failure of the holding plate systems were more likely due to diminishing voltage issues that are fairly common with Fla batteries as they age and suffer from PSOC regardless people thinking they are getting to full charge daily or even weekly.
Then there is the pukert effect of large amperage draws associated with refrigeration systems that trigger the lvc on the compressor control unit. It did happen to me one time.
Since conversion the Spencer has not had any of those issues happen.
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 11:28   #482
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

And a whole 'nother major tangent begins.

Holding plate refrigeration systems are perfectly fine.

They do not **require** a more powerful electrical setup than evaporators.

But they do really **benefit** from setups where there are times of such high power production that "free excess" energy is available.

To the point that only a small fraction of refrigeration loads needs to come from bank storage.

This can reduce the size of the bank needed; holding plates are in effect an alternative way to store energy, just for that specific use.
john61ct is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 13:01   #483
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblinrod View Post
The answer is pure and simple.

I have been very clear to state, every use case is individual and requires a thorough review to determine electrical system requirements that will represent best value for money.
This is a fair enough statement. It does leave out that not all people are motivated or even care about the best value for money. People do things for their own reasons and are quite happy to pay more for things that they value. And they get pissed off when someone tells them what they should spend their money on.

Quote:
I have also been very clear to state that the recommendations I have made are related to the needs of the average cruising sailboat.
Yes, you have. The error is that you left off average cruising sailboat that I have seen in my very small part of the world.

You assume that your observation are global and just not limited to you.
Quote:

If your use case is not average, obviously and without doubt your needs may vary.
Great start, you do see that there might be cases where LiFePO4 is a good choice.
Quote:

In the case of the OP, when Ocean Passagemakers like SV Delos cruise with solar and wind generating all the time, I don’t understand why others couldn’t do same. “Reasons” May be valid and then again, perhaps not.
I'm not sure if you have actually watched Delos. They run their generator all the time. They run it to charge their batteries, they run it to power the AC and who knows what else. What they do not do is only use their solar and wind to meet their power needs.
Quote:

It is true Delos just switched to LiFePO4 drop ins. They had a factory or distributor rep fly many 1000s of miles to personally consult them. I suspect they got the batteries for free or nearly so.
Quote:

I would be tempted to transition under these circumstances myself.

However, this is most certainly NOT an average case.
Gosh, corporate sponsorship. I wish I had corporate sponsorship. Corporations are tripping over themselves to get their products on SV Delos. I cannot fault them there.

Delos has what $200,000 plus coming in from their videos. They can afford to put in any technology they want. They could have used Thin plate, Firefly, fule cells, or Lithium et al. But they chose LiFePO4. Did they get a good deal? More than likely but do not make the mistake to think that they went to LiFePO4 because of corporate sponsorship. They went LiFePO4 because of the power that LiFePO4 gives them.

Special case? Duh.
Quote:

So please, stop bombarding me with one off use cases.
11.34 g/cm3

Every boat (and boat owner) is a one off case. You are being bombarded because you have created a fiction where you say that everyone should use lead. And when presented with exceptions you make the one off statement.
Quote:

If you are unique, (or wish to pretend to be) I DONT CARE.

What I do care about is folks promoting LFP for average case.
If that were only true. Sigh....

It appears to me and IMHO you care very much. Not really about folks promoting LFP for average cases but that list members object to your proclamations. And ask for proof....

Quote:
Sorry, but I have performed enough energy system reviews to know it is not the best solution for the average cruising sailboat. Like I said early in.
I agree with you fully and so do the other list members. But you did not stop there.

Pretty much everyone here agrees that there are no drop in LiFePO4 systems that can be run as if they were Lead Acid systems.

We all pretty much agree that LiFePO4 systems require a lot more understanding and hands on than the typical weekend cruiser has or wants.

We all pretty much agree that for the cruise willing to take the time and effort that LiFePO4 will give much better service than FLA (and LA in general).

But you did not stop there. You went far beyond. It appears to me that you required all of us to agree with your opinion and confuse your opinion with fact. Of course I could be wrong...
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 13:09   #484
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Speaking of hands on do any of you remember manual controls of the alternators field current to get the most charging out of your alternators?

Balmar pretty much put that one out of the running.

I do remember and also remember wanting one badly. They really were for long term cruisers.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	s-l500.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	23.1 KB
ID:	176679  
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 13:10   #485
Marine Service Provider
 
SV THIRD DAY's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: La Paz, Mexico
Boat: 1978 Hudson Force 50 Ketch
Posts: 3,921
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

What ever happened to the simple brevity is the sole of whit posts?
__________________
Rich Boren
Cruise RO & Schenker Water Makers
Technautics CoolBlue Refrigeration
SV THIRD DAY is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 16:27   #486
Registered User
 
Training Wheels's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Left coast.
Posts: 1,451
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evm1024 View Post
Speaking of hands on do any of you remember manual controls of the alternators field current to get the most charging out of your alternators?



Balmar pretty much put that one out of the running.



I do remember and also remember wanting one badly. They really were for long term cruisers.


I put that on the 45’ Rhodes ketch we had in the 80’s! Ruh roh, I’m dating myself.
Training Wheels is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 18:16   #487
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evm1024 View Post
Speaking of hands on do any of you remember manual controls of the alternators field current to get the most charging out of your alternators?
Modern equivalent is Al Thomason's open source Very Smart Regulator / "Smart Alternator Regulator" project

http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...rt-195059.html
john61ct is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 18:57   #488
Registered User
 
rgleason's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Boat: 1981 Bristol 32 Sloop
Posts: 17,766
Images: 2
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

I think the thread discusses and reflects on the basic premise of the OP proposition.
1980's alternator control schemes are interesting, but not germaine.
rgleason is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 18:58   #489
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by john61ct View Post
Modern equivalent is Al Thomason's open source Very Smart Regulator / "Smart Alternator Regulator" project

http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...rt-195059.html
I have one. Nice project. Inspiring.

the point with tthe manual voltage regulation is that we have been trying to get the most out of lead acid for decades. And that in a decade or few perhaps LiFePO4 controls will be out of the dark ages.

Eventually I'll post something about how the VSR works with my 700 ah LiFePO4 house bank.
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:01   #490
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgleason View Post
I think the thread discusses and reflects on the basic premise of the OP proposition.
1980's alternator control schemes are interesting, but not germaine.
The thread was hijacked because the LiFePO4 vs FLA - The Real Deal thread was closed.

The myth was resolved to be true.
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:04   #491
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,245
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by evm1024 View Post
The thread was hijacked because the LiFePO4 vs FLA - The Real Deal thread was closed.

The myth was resolved to be true.
there was some good data about DOD and longevity for both Fla and Lfp systems.
But yes deeper discharge causes shorter life.
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:35   #492
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2017
Boat: Retired from CF
Posts: 13,317
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Yes every 50 OT posts or so let's keep inserting a reminder.

Rehashing that all over again would now be OT itself.

Which means in this one we can talk about **anything**.

Anyone game for crimping vs solder vs both? 8-D
john61ct is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:38   #493
cruiser

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Ontario
Boat: Ontario 38 / Douglas 32 Mk II
Posts: 3,250
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by newhaul View Post
the failure of the holding plate systems were more likely due to diminishing voltage issues that are fairly common with Fla batteries as they age and suffer from PSOC regardless people thinking they are getting to full charge daily or even weekly.
Then there is the pukert effect of large amperage draws associated with refrigeration systems that trigger the lvc on the compressor control unit. It did happen to me one time.
Since conversion the Spencer has not had any of those issues happen.
That’s good.

I’ve installed a number of evaporator box and plate refrigeration systems .

I’ve never had a problem on FLA banks with proper charging systems.

They just sit there and run; nobody has to do anything.
ramblinrod is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:39   #494
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by john61ct View Post
Yes every 50 OT posts or so let's keep inserting a reminder.

Rehashing that all over again would now be OT itself.

Which means in this one we can talk about **anything**.

Anyone game for crimping vs solder vs both? 8-D
Cat vs mono? Everyone knows that Mono is more cost effective. So no-one should even consider a cat given the return on investment.
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Old 01-09-2018, 19:46   #495
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cruising Mexico Currently
Boat: Gulfstar 50
Posts: 1,980
Re: Depth of Discharge Myth?

First thing the surveyor does before even seeing the boat is mark "electrical system need work".

Close to 100% of boats have defective electrical (read charging) systems.

To say with proper charging systems is to ask for a perfect world. And a bit of a sham. IMHO
evm1024 is offline   Reply
Closed Thread

Tags
depth


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:31.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.