Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 24-10-2016, 14:54   #31
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 474
Re: Reference Cell Test Results, Help to Determin Resolution

There are numerous issues, not least of which the bellows weaken over time and have to be replaced every 5yrs, give or take.

Once a leak starts, be it caused by poor alignment or weak bellows, the stainless rotor pits and gets totally gummed up with salt deposits and other junk.

Considerable maintenance required, and replacing bellows requires a shaft pull.

Also very easy to get the bellows installed off-center on the shaft log just by tightening the house clamps.
boatbod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2016, 22:21   #32
Marine Service Provider

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria BC
Boat: Cal 2-46'
Posts: 672
Re: Reference Cell Test Results, Help to Determin Resolution

Boatbod, your comments are valid but can be remidied. I'm not a pss salesman but my clients read this thread. I'd like them to feel confident.
* bellows weakens. Yes it does. I try for 2 1/2-3 yrs between haulouts. I change the bellows every other haulout. 5-6 yrs. I think thats ok. The kits are a little pricy but im ok with it, for its special perpose in life.
* 5-6 yrs also Change the o-rings, all the set screws and have a good look at it all. Throw the ss rotor on the lathe and give both sides a good polish or skim. Sometimes I just flip them so 10-12 years before another skim or machine.
* they do get ugly on the outside with gummy salty debris. When I get them apart those surfaces are usually spotless. I stopped cleaning the outside other than a qwick scotchbrite, just for looks.
* pulling the shaft. my feeling is the shaft should come out of the coupling every 5-6 yrs anyway. You get a chance to inspect all those spinny things, rear seal, rusty bolts, key slop and alignment etc. Not sure why a seal leak can be blamed when you have a missalignment issue.
* stern tube. I agree they can get off centre when tightening. The bellows material is soft and all i use are awab's so you can squish the guts out of them if you overtighten. If the tube is rough glass or off centre then yes, thats an issue that needs to be addressed first. Take some care when setting the bellows, try a few posititions before deciding to say its good enough.
I don't feel them to be considerable maintenance at all, just maintenance. What seal do you prefer?
ce
groundtackle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2016, 23:34   #33
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Boat: Island Packet 40
Posts: 6,501
Images: 7
Re: Reference Cell Test Results, Help to Determin Resolution

Quote:
Originally Posted by senormechanico View Post
It's not a resistance reading, but after electrically coupling mine as above, I got exactly the same voltage reading on my bonding system to the reference cell.
I measured the prop shaft, the bonding system in the middle of the boat, and at the forwardmost thruhull.

AFAIK, it's working fine.
So it appears that for all practical purposes there is no voltage difference between any of the submerged metal components to drive any current flows and consequently should not be any electrolytic corrosion. The bonding is complete and effective.
RaymondR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2016, 08:05   #34
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 474
Re: Reference Cell Test Results, Help to Determin Resolution

Groundtackle,

I think we're in agreement that 5-6 years is about max bellows life and also time to perform major overhaul of rotor & o-rings. On a twin engine 40 footer, you're looking at a $2k repair bill, which although not excessive, is not exactly peanuts either.

Loss of other options out there, and much to be said for regular packing glands. We've tried most everything at some time or other and all have pluses and minuses.
boatbod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2016, 08:51   #35
Registered User
 
senormechanico's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2003
Boat: Dragonfly 1000 trimaran
Posts: 7,228
Re: Reference Cell Test Results, Help to Determin Resolution

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondR View Post
So it appears that for all practical purposes there is no voltage difference between any of the submerged metal components to drive any current flows and consequently should not be any electrolytic corrosion. The bonding is complete and effective.
Yuppers, with the exception of the zinc itself.

__________________
'You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.

Mae West
senormechanico is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
enc


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vesper AIS SP-160 "relay/splitter" test results, lab/real world ka4wja Marine Electronics 38 06-06-2020 15:37
EPIRB Battery Test Results wrwakefield Health, Safety & Related Gear 17 28-03-2016 11:07
Resolution of Soundings in Vector Chart davidfay OpenCPN 8 12-09-2012 00:56
My Battery Load Test Results - Advice, Please ? Poozer Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 8 21-07-2011 04:48
XTide Has Higher Resolution Coastline Data seandepagnier OpenCPN 1 18-01-2010 14:15

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.