Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-07-2016, 19:17   #1
Registered User
 
Opie91's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Boat: C&C 34
Posts: 1,056
Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

I need to replace my house bank of 4 - 6 volt batteries. I am looking for some longevity and pretty much decided on Trojan batteries.

Question: Is there a substantial difference in the T105 GC (Golf Cart) and the T105 RE (Renewable Energy) batteries?

Is it worth the extra $30 USD a battery?

Thanks for input
Opie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 19:38   #2
Registered User
 
ErikFinn's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Malaysia, Thailand
Boat: Beneteau Oceanis 430
Posts: 860
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Check out the discharge cycle rates at Trojan's website, at pdf brochures if I remember correct. RE's is about 1600 cycles to 50% discharge, vs about 1200 for the standard T105. RE is a bit taller and slightly heavier if I recall correct ( more lead?).
For 30 bucks difference I would take RE anyday. Shame nobody offers them around here.
ErikFinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 21:02   #3
Marine Service Provider
 
Scott Berg's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Aboard
Boat: Seaton 60' Ketch
Posts: 1,341
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

We opted for the RE's. Same height but they are REALLY 181mm wide whereas the GC models are about 179.5

In a box made to hold 6 this required us to do some carpentry! That said so far so good; ask me in 5 more years....
__________________
Scott Berg
WAØLSS
SV CHARDONNAY
Scott Berg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2016, 17:10   #4
Registered User
 
Opie91's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Boat: C&C 34
Posts: 1,056
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Thanks for the input.

I did see the additional life cycles on the RE. The place I am buying them from says they have a 5 year warranty. Not the GC batteries.

Since the RE will fit I'll spend the extra $30/ea.
Opie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2016, 23:20   #5
Registered User
 
Aloft's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Check out the depth of the electrolyte above the plates on the REs. Some batteries have a tendency to dry out when on a long tack, and while I haven't stuck a yardstick inside one, I suspect the REs may have a shallower reserve that the mobile-oriented ones. If anyone has them, please report back!
__________________
Eschew anoesis _/) *
Aloft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 08:01   #6
Registered User
 
Opie91's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Boat: C&C 34
Posts: 1,056
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Aloft, good point.

I am starting to second guess the RE decision. After looking at all of the cycle life data on the T105 & T105RE it is all based on the battery being stationary. Starting to wonder if the RE will hold up to use in a sailboat. The T105 (golf cart) is made to take the abuse of a golf cart.
Opie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 08:05   #7
Moderator Emeritus
 
nigel1's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Boat: Beneteau 473
Posts: 5,595
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

What about the T125's, I think they are the same size as the T105'w, but have a larger capacity.
__________________
Nigel
Beneteau 473
Manchester, UK
nigel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 10:53   #8
Registered User
 
Opie91's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Boat: C&C 34
Posts: 1,056
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Quote:
Originally Posted by nigel1 View Post
What about the T125's, I think they are the same size as the T105'w, but have a larger capacity.
Good point. They are built for golf carts and are the same price as the 105RE batteries. Starting to lean towards the 125 now.
Opie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2016, 07:50   #9
Registered User
 
ErikFinn's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Malaysia, Thailand
Boat: Beneteau Oceanis 430
Posts: 860
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Berg View Post
We opted for the RE's. Same height but they are REALLY 181mm wide whereas the GC models are about 179.5

In a box made to hold 6 this required us to do some carpentry! That said so far so good; ask me in 5 more years....

This size matter started to bother me now.

From Trojan's site:

T-105 Deep-Cycle Flooded:
Dimensions inches (mm)
Length 10.30 (262)
Width 7.11 (181)
Height 11.07 (281)

T-105 | Trojan Battery Company


T-105 RE Deep-Cycle Flooded
Dimensions inches (mm)
Length 10.30 (262)
Width 7.11 (181)
Height 11.67 (296)

T-105-RE | Trojan Battery Company

As far as I can see the only difference is in the Height. 281mm vs. 296mm. RE being 15mm taller.

Am I looking at wrong batteries? Or are the batteries shaped differently so the RE needs more width than what it's specs say?




( T-125 here )
ErikFinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2016, 23:53   #10
Registered User
 
Aloft's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Quote:
We opted for the RE's. Same height but they are REALLY 181mm wide whereas the GC models are about 179.5

In a box made to hold 6 this required us to do some carpentry!
1.5mm per battery, or 9mm for the 6 kept them from fitting? That's a tight box! I looked at Interstate and Exide, and they are 181mm also, so that seems to be the norm. Most boxes I see have a little bit of slop, a good idea. A 1/4"-3/8" piece of wood to take up the space is a lot easier than renting a box stretcher.

I do note that the Trojan RE and T-145 are slightly taller, not usually a problem on a boat. But likely an issue under the seat of a golf cart.
__________________
Eschew anoesis _/) *
Aloft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2016, 03:24   #11
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Boat: 1981 Ta Tong Cape Horn Cutter
Posts: 330
Images: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to gts1544
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Folks, FYI - I just bought 4 @ Energizer 107 AH GC 6 VDC at Sam's for $85 @ to be wired series / parallel for my pick up truck camper, which sports a 3000 W inverter used intermittently. Service free / 1 year replacement / 5 year prorated. Since they do have cell service caps, I intend to carefully over service them since they are almost impossible to access without removing the camper from the truck bed. Don't know if this info is of any use, but I thought that I would throw it out there! I am also going to use lock nuts on the posts after thoroughly dielectric greasing the entire assembly. George
gts1544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2016, 03:58   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SW Florida
Boat: Grand Banks 49
Posts: 572
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie91 View Post
I need to replace my house bank of 4 - 6 volt batteries. I am looking for some longevity and pretty much decided on Trojan batteries.

Question: Is there a substantial difference in the T105 GC (Golf Cart) and the T105 RE (Renewable Energy) batteries?

Is it worth the extra $30 USD a battery?

Thanks for input
===

I have no experience with the T-105 RE but I do with T-105 vs T-145. The T-145s cost more and are slightly higher but their capacity and longevity has proven to be significantly better. Since changing out the batteries is such a significant hassle, I have opted for my second set of T-145s. My first set lasted for 6 years of hard service. My old T-105s were failing after 2 or 3 years.
wayne.b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2016, 04:43   #13
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, California - Read about our circumnavigation at www.rutea.com
Boat: Contest 48
Posts: 1,056
Images: 1
Re: Trojan T105 GC vs T105 RE

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne.b View Post
===

I have no experience with the T-105 RE but I do with T-105 vs T-145. The T-145s cost more and are slightly higher but their capacity and longevity has proven to be significantly better. Since changing out the batteries is such a significant hassle, I have opted for my second set of T-145s. My first set lasted for 6 years of hard service. My old T-105s were failing after 2 or 3 years.
I also had excellent results with the T145s. When underway or at anchor, we typically go through nearly 400 amps per day and our batteries get a real workout. The Trojans held up for about five years through hundreds of deep discharges and charges.

Fair winds and calm seas.
nhschneider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New T105 battery questions Utahsailor Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 7 29-05-2015 10:31
In DR can get T105 at $133. Good deal?? chuckr Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 6 21-04-2012 18:27
Honda eu2000, Iota 55 Charger, Trojan T105 Batteries davisr Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 32 27-11-2009 16:52
Trojan T105's cost increases Pblais Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 29 15-09-2008 09:02
Can this Trojan T105 be saved? senormechanico Electrical: Batteries, Generators & Solar 15 09-10-2007 14:43

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:36.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.