Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2021, 12:23   #1
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Alameda, Ca
Boat: Jeanneau SO410
Posts: 12
1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Hi All,
I'm going to ask a question and try not to sound stupid. I have been sailing a while but I never did understand (or ask) what a 2:1 halyard was when rigging my code 0. I have had people say you should have it 2:1 so that it whares the tension but I'm not sure if mine is or is not.

I have a line from the cabin that goes to a pully at the base of the mast, hits a block, and travels up the mast (inside) it then goes around another. pully at the tip and at an angle down to my bowsprit. I have assumed that this is a 2:1 but was never sure... I always thought 2 pullies meant 2:1. but really one is directing the turn up the mast and I have a triangle at the sail (one up and one to the top of a sail. If I don't have it rigged 2:1 how do I?

Thanks
SVSweetestThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 12:33   #2
Moderator
 
Adelie's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,758
Re: 1:1 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Line goes up the mast across a pulley and down the the sail, that’s 1:1.

Line goes up the mast, across a pulley, down to the sail, around another pulley then back up to the top of the mast; that’s 2:1.

The load is the pull of the sail.

With 1:1 the load from the sail is the same as the load in the line.

With 2:1 the load in the line is half that coming from the sail. The mast experiences about the same load but you experience half the load when pulling the sail up. You also have to pull the rope twice as far.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
Adelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 13:22   #3
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Alameda, Ca
Boat: Jeanneau SO410
Posts: 12
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Then for a code O is it best to re-rig it to a 2:1 or can it work fine with a 1:1? or stay with the 1:1 and just grind it tight? Right now it's rigged as a 1:1
SVSweetestThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 13:28   #4
Moderator
 
Adelie's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,758
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Your boat is bigger than I usually sail. 2:1 is something you would use if the halyard loads were rather high. I have no opinion as to whether you would benefit.
Have you had trouble hoisting the CZ or having the clear or clutch it is secured to slip?
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
Adelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 13:34   #5
Moderator
 
Adelie's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Ciudad de la Misión Didacus de Alcalá en Alta California, Virreinato de Nueva España
Boat: Cal 20
Posts: 20,758
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

I have heard of 2:1 for a main halyard. It seems reasonably you might use one for a job halyard rather than installing a downhaul for the jib.

Unless the sail area is really huge and it’s difficult to get up I don’t see a reason. For the job and main the halyard can be used to fine tune the tension in the luff. With a spinnaker or similar such as a CZ getting luff tension exactly right isn’t very important.
__________________
Num Me Vexo?
For all of your celestial navigation questions: https://navlist.net/
A house is but a boat so poorly built and so firmly run aground no one would think to try and refloat it.
Adelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 21:57   #6
Registered User
 
fxykty's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indonesia
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 3,936
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVSweetestThing View Post
Then for a code O is it best to re-rig it to a 2:1 or can it work fine with a 1:1? or stay with the 1:1 and just grind it tight? Right now it's rigged as a 1:1

Ask a sail maker and/or rigger whether (1) you can apply enough luff tension to the Code 0 with the current 1:1 halyard (probably yes) and (2) that the halyard clutch is strong enough to hold the 1:1 tension when sailing (if existing sail and setup then probably yes, but if new by you then have it checked). Note that in gusts and/or waves the tension in the halyard can double the static tension; that is usually why larger boats use 2:1 for Code 0 halyards.

Bottom line, if this sail and halyard came with your boat then probably OK, but if it’s a recent addition by previous owner or by you then definitely have a professional check it out.
fxykty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 22:10   #7
Registered User
 
fxykty's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indonesia
Boat: Outremer 55L
Posts: 3,936
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVSweetestThing View Post
Then for a code O is it best to re-rig it to a 2:1 or can it work fine with a 1:1? or stay with the 1:1 and just grind it tight? Right now it's rigged as a 1:1

As to rigging it 2:1, you’ll need a longer halyard (by the length of the distance from the upper mast pulley to the bowsprit). You can save money by splicing a lighter line to the cockpit end of the existing halyard to make up the extra length, as that end will never see sailing loads.[LIST][*]The halyard will be secured at the top pulley. An eye splice is best, but a halyard knot is OK. It will be spliced/knotted to a shackle that can be attached to the same place as the upper mast pulley.[*]You will need a block with a snap or halyard or soft shackle that will create the lower end of the 2:1. The pulley will sit on a bight of the halyard and the snap/halyard/soft shackle will attach to the upper swivel of the Code 0. Something like this http://www.antal.it/eng/LS046_en (not sure what strength you would need).
fxykty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2021, 23:02   #8
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: EC
Boat: Cruising Catamaran
Posts: 1,177
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

The 2:1 will be easier to haul, but twice as much line. On a 2:1 the load on the halyard is shared between the sheave and the attachment point near the sheave, so the sheave pulley and spindle have less load on them than a 1:1. There is also less vertical compression load on the mast with a 2:1.


Long discussion here on it:
https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums...-191698-2.html
Tin Tin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2021, 08:49   #9
Registered User
 
sowwaninii's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Boat: sabre 456 and leopard 42
Posts: 145
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

My code 0 is rigged with a 1:1 halyard, but my tack line goes through a block so I can adjust the tension on the luff depending on point of sail and wind velocity.
sowwaninii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2021, 10:00   #10
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 268
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

It's basically a spinnaker halyard - on a 41 footer you don't need a 2to1 (and, in fact, the huge coil of rope will get in the way on your mast or in your cockpit)

Speaking hypothetically you'd probably get more value from a 2to1 on your main halyard when you are putting in and shaking out reefs ... but still not really worth it for your size of yacht.
jannw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2021, 10:07   #11
Moderator Emeritus
 
roverhi's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2
Posts: 7,505
Send a message via Yahoo to roverhi
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Tin View Post
There is also less vertical compression load on the mast with a 2:1.]
The compression load on the mast will be the same with 1-1, 2-1 or any other combination. The down force will be split between the block and anchor point on on the mast but compression will be the two loads added together. In fact down force could be greater if you are using the force multiplier of the multi part setup to get more tension on the sail luff.

Crewed on a trimaran with 2-1 halyards which were a pain to hoist sails because of the doubled length of the halyard. Unfortunately it was necessary as the load on the halyard was so great the clutches would barely hold the line at full tensioned hoist.
__________________
Peter O.
'Ae'a, Pearson 35
'Ms American Pie', Sabre 28 Mark II
roverhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2021, 10:25   #12
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North East USA
Boat: 1975 Tartan 41'
Posts: 1,049
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

OK, I'm seeing the opposite statement of my experiences. Spinnakers/Code zero's are light sails easy to hoist (assuming they are furled or in a snuffer when they go up). We had a 2:1 on our spinnaker in a 22ft race boat. The 2:1 was rigged opposite what everybody is saying. You pull 1 foot, the sail goes up 2ft. The sail weight is 15lbs... It takes 30lbs (plus a little friction) to hoist. We did this to allow for very quick hoisting when racing. I now sail a 41ft boat with a big spinnaker. We have a 1:1 on it. I don't see the need for a 2:1 making the forces lower to hoist unless you have a very heavy code 0. Can you hoist it physically without it catching wind? if yes, then no need to make changes... you should Not be hoisting it full of wind.



The OP doesn't know if he has a 2:1. Easy to check. Pull a measured distance on one end and see if the other end move the same distance. If yes, 1:1. if the distance is different, the ratio of distances moved gives you the 'purchase" ratio on the line.
zstine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2021, 11:45   #13
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Alameda, Ca
Boat: Jeanneau SO410
Posts: 12
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

I know the rigging just was not sure if it was "called" 1:1 or 2:1 as the way I have it rigged. I was under the opinion that it created less load doing it this way. If there are no hoist issues it sounds like having a 1:1 vs a 2:1 is really not much of an issue with a lite sail.
SVSweetestThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2021, 04:21   #14
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ranieri/Bari, S. Italy
Boat: Jeanneau 43ds
Posts: 644
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

I am not quite sure what you mean by a Code Zero. If it is a gennaker on a top-down furler then you will need a lot of tension on the torsion rope. I hv a 43 ft Jeanneau 43ds with a 1100 sq ft gennaker. Hauling the furled sail up to the top of the mast is the easy bit. The challenge comes when you need a v high tension for unfurling or furling. I found this v difficult with a manual winch but it is easy if i pass the halyard across to my electric winch on port. This means i am fine with my 1:1 and avoid all the extra "spaghetti" in the cockpit which would result from a 2:1.

If you are talking about a conventional sail rather than a downwind gennaker/assymetric then you should find a 1:1 perfectly adequate on your boat. If the Spinlocks are not holding yr halyard at yr chosen tension then there is a kit that Spinlock supplies to replace the inner bits that grab the line but try flushing the Spinlock out with fresh water first to see if that fixes it. Otherwise the inner bits of the Spinlock is an easy DIY replacement. This solution is probably cheaper than changing yr halyard to a larger diam.

Andrew
__________________
SaltyMetals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2021, 04:57   #15
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: EC
Boat: Cruising Catamaran
Posts: 1,177
Re: 1:1 vs 2:1 halyard for Code Zero

Quote:
Originally Posted by roverhi View Post
The compression load on the mast will be the same with 1-1, 2-1 or any other combination. The down force will be split between the block and anchor point on on the mast but compression will be the two loads added together. In fact down force could be greater if you are using the force multiplier of the multi part setup to get more tension on the sail luff.

Crewed on a trimaran with 2-1 halyards which were a pain to hoist sails because of the doubled length of the halyard. Unfortunately it was necessary as the load on the halyard was so great the clutches would barely hold the line at full tensioned hoist.

I don't think this is correct, I understand the compressive load is reduced by 25% over a 1:1 system, but a more qualified physicist can explain why I am sure. See post 18 of the attached http://forums.sailinganarchy.com/ind...d-on-the-mast/
Tin Tin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
code zero, halyard


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Code Zero ? bluewater General Sailing Forum 42 12-02-2012 08:50
For Sale: Code Zero Asymmetrical Spinnaker idanno Classifieds Archive 4 11-11-2011 11:32
Code Zero, Blast Reacher, Continuous Furler ? akio.kanemoto Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 32 28-09-2011 15:35
Adding a Code Zero PeregrineSea Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 3 19-04-2011 16:12
Code Zero Furler kiapa Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting 13 27-10-2009 17:38

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.