US coasts sea level rise 10 to 12 inches by 2050

[AllenRbrts]

Originally Posted by LakeSuperior

IMHO, it would be better to stay in one's own lane of expertise than to parrot information that you really don't have much of a clue about.

Interesting statement. I assume you are referring to me, but I was really making that very point about the article posted by three folks not versed in the field, being published by a internet made up journal. I cited references to multiple peer reviewed journals that specifically debunked the article posted. I can only assume you didn't read either the original article or the real journal article explaining the actual science.

[Montanan]

Originally Posted by newhaul

I know I shouldn't have to point this out but fish are not animals.

This should not need to be pointed out, but . . .

Fish are classed as animals. Fish belong to one of the six general animal groups which are: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by Lake-Effect

And you're here because...?

Me I'm just waiting for you to reach that aha moment when you realise they lied to you .

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by Montanan

This should not need to be pointed out, but . . .

Fish are classed as animals. Fish belong to one of the six general animal groups which are: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates.

I stand corrected I should have specified mammals.
That eat plants .

[Montanan]

Originally Posted by newhaul

I stand corrected I should have specified mammals.
That eat plants .

[AllenRbrts]

Originally Posted by newhaul

Sorry but I will have to go with dr Happer. As he is a physicist who specializes in spectroscopy.

Actually my post you quoted was not about Happer. I don't actually know what science he specifically cites for his belief that CO2 has only a modest effect in the atmosphere. If you can find what science he claims for his position, would love to see it. Let me know what you find.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by AllenRbrts

Actually my post you quoted was not about Happer. I don't actually know what science he specifically cites for his belief that CO2 has only a modest effect in the atmosphere. If you can find what science he claims for his position, would love to see it. Let me know what you find.

Read my post again the reason is in black and white . His specialty is physics and specificly spectroscopy.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Montanan

Fish do eat plants.

Parrotfish, chubs, surgeonfish, blue tang and doctorfish are some of the more common herbivorous fish typically found around reef areas, which provide an ideal habitat with sufficient food and protective shelter.

https://sciencing.com/marine-animals...s-8067083.html

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Fish do eat plants.



https://sciencing.com/marine-animals...s-8067083.html

But fish are not mammals as I corrected my posting .

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by newhaul

But fish are not mammals as I corrected my posting .

And, onions are not potatoes.
And, Dr. Will Happer is not a climatologist.
And, our climate is not cooling.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by GordMay

And, onions are not potatoes.
And, Dr. Will Happer is not a climatologist.
And, our climate is not cooling.

Three for three.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by GordMay

And, onions are not potatoes.
And, Dr. Will Happer is not a climatologist.
And, our climate is not cooling.

Never said he was .
Btw Michael Mann is not a climatologist either
What is your point .

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by GordMay

And, onions are not potatoes.
And, Dr. Will Happer is not a climatologist.
And, our climate is not cooling.

Actually it is cooling .

[jackdale]

The planet continues to warm

The year culminated as the sixth warmest year on record for the globe with a temperature that was 0.84°C (1.51°F) above the 20th century average. The years 2013–2021 all rank among the ten warmest years on record. The year 2021 was also the 45th consecutive year (since 1977) with global temperatures, at least nominally, above the 20th century average. Of note, the year 2005, which was the first year to set a new global temperature record in the 21st century, currently ties with 2013 as the 10th warmest year on record and 2010 ranks as the ninth warmest on record. Overall, the global annual temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.08°C (0.14°F) per decade since 1880 and over twice that rate (0.18°C / 0.32°F) since 1981.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/202113

[donradcliffe]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Your science is served, sir



https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-022-01290-z.epdf

I'm not going to spend my money on their BS, but the part of the article that was free admitted it was speculation and they cherry picked the years.

What REALLY got to me was Here, we show that after exceptional drought severity in 2021, ~19% of which is attributable to anthropo-genic climate trends,.

What what was behind the 19%? Why wasn't it 18 or 20% ? Do you really expect me to believe that their "science" is accurate to 1%? Or that they are just priests who ascribe every drought year, flood, cyclone, heat wave, blizzard, and hurricane to anthropogenic climate trends.

How about more hurricanes? How's that working out for them?

Seasons with the highest Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE), 1851-Present
Rank Year ACE Index
1. 2005 250
2. 1950 243
3. 1893 231
4. 1995 228
5. 2004 227
6. 1926 222
7. 1933 213
8. 1961 205
9. 1955 199
10. 1998 182