US coasts sea level rise 10 to 12 inches by 2050

[Montanan]

Originally Posted by seandepagnier

the true reason why we do not detect extra terrestrial life is the amount of time technology is sufficient to do is not very long until the civilization destroys itself through extinction so the probability of is just extremely low, and even if we did detect some radio waves, whatever sent it would be long extinct by the time we received it.

So basically saying it would be yesterday's news, [or rather yestermillieniums news].

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by GordMay

The Summary for Policymakers of the IPCC Working Group II report*, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability was approved on Sunday, February 27 2022, by 195 member governments of the IPCC, through a virtual approval session that was held over two weeks starting on February 14.

Chapter 4 assesses current climate change impacts on the global water cycle, projected water-related risks for human and natural systems, and adaptation options and effectiveness.

Chapter 4: Water ➥ https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg2/pdf/IP..._Chapter04.pdf

* ➥ https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums...ml#post3583848

It will take me a couple weeks to muddle through the 3675 pages of the full report .

( joking it will likely take me a month or more .

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by newhaul

He is a geologist.
What is his PhD in?
What was his thesis in ? Who did he submit it to ? Who got his work to verify his findings?

Michael Mann was granted his PhD in geology and geophysics in 1998 [Yale University], and his PhD thesis was titled "A study of ocean-atmosphere interaction and low-frequency variability of the climate system”, for which he was awarded the Phillip M. Orville Prize, for outstanding dissertation in the earth sciences.


What climate science work has Will Happer done?

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by GordMay

What climate science work has Will Happer done?

Happer's academic career has nothing to do with climate science.

We are interested in studying the physics of spin-polarized atoms and nuclei, and the use of such polarized systems in various applications, including polarized noble gases for nuclear physics experiments and NMR lung diagnostics, vapor cell atomic clocks, and sodium laser guidestars.

https://physics.princeton.edu//atomic/happer/index.html

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by GordMay

Michael Mann was granted his PhD in geology and geophysics in 1998 [Yale University], and his PhD thesis was titled "A study of ocean-atmosphere interaction and low-frequency variability of the climate system”, for which he was awarded the Phillip M. Orville Prize, for outstanding dissertation in the earth sciences.

My freshman geography course included climatology and meteorology, as well as geomorphology, cartography, geology, etc..

[Montanan]

Copied from Gord May's recent post to the Jokes Thread.

Meteorologists have weighed rainbows.
They’ve found, that they’re pretty light.

[Bycrick]

None of the people posting all of these "scientific studies" expect you to read or understand them. They want you to look at the pounds of virtual paper, and "accept" and "believe."

[Montanan]

Re: The IPCC report released yesterday is the second of three reviews from the world's foremost body of climate researchers.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60525591

[AllenRbrts]

Originally Posted by Bycrick

None of the people posting all of these "scientific studies" expect you to read or understand them. They want you to look at the pounds of virtual paper, and "accept" and "believe."

Here is a paper to read which is pretty understandable (for a scientific paper) and clearly explains why CO2 will cause warming of the planet and it's interaction with water vapor. No climate models involved.. just thermodynamics. The basic mechanism has been known for 150 years.

https://climateknowledge.org/figures..._BAMS_1997.pdf

You can say you don't reject the science, here is a chance to understand it.

The science doesn't tell us directly how to fix it. If we could invent a cost effective way to suck CO2 from the air, we could keep happily burning fossil fuels. Most people think it is easier to greatly reduce the use of fossil fuels than remove CO2, but perhaps they are wrong.

[Lake-Effect]

Originally Posted by Bycrick

None of the people posting all of these "scientific studies" expect you to read or understand them. They want you to look at the pounds of virtual paper, and "accept" and "believe."

Experience has shown that people like you are either incapable of or unwilling to engage with the actual science. Your words put you solidly in the "unwilling" category.

Nonetheless, hope springs eternal, and people keep posting studies. Perhaps some day you'll finally get it.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by Montanan

Re: The IPCC report released yesterday is the second of three reviews from the world's foremost body of climate researchers.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60525591

To many mistakes and outright lies in that hit piece.

Do some fact checking and you will see

[newhaul]

They must just throw darts at the board and drap it out of somewhere south of the belt line

The press release
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/r...press-release/

The world faces unavoidable multiple climate hazards over the next two decades with global warming of 1.5°C (2.7°F).

Another prediction that won't happen .

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by Lake-Effect

Experience has shown that people like you are either incapable of or unwilling to engage with the actual science. Your words put you solidly in the "unwilling" category.

Nonetheless, hope springs eternal, and people keep posting studies. Perhaps some day you'll finally get it.

Yep 99% of the MMGWC studies conclusions are wrong .

[Bycrick]

I don’t need to understand the details of "the science," any more than I need to understand specifically how my iPad or my cellphone works, before I send an email or make a phone call. But when the proposed solutions seem to call for massive changes, all right now, I’m skeptical of the solutions.

[Bycrick]

"People like me." How about people like you? It must be nice to believe that you’ve got all the answers.