Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > Emergency, Disaster and Distress
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Closed Thread
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-07-2021, 21:25   #301
Registered User
 
garyfdl's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Fond du Lac WI
Boat: Watkins 27 - 27'
Posts: 923
Re: For all promoting flare guns for self defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
As demonstrated in the video I posted above, a cut shell prints the same as a slug. The pellets are held in the cup, not flying free.
It's not about the 'print'. It's about penetration.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
Of course it’s less powerful than buckshot or a slug. But it’s effective at short range.
'Effective'? Compared to what? As you already stated it's less powerful, that means less penetration, and that's what the 'game' is about. Again, you can't rely on an assailant facing you head on, where this round would be most 'effective'. And why wouldn't you chose the most effective round for self defense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
even without cutting the shell, spread of birdshot is about 1” per yard.
That's an old rule of thumb. It actually depends on barrel length, choke, wad type, and load.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
if the distance is 2 yards, the assailant gets a 2” hole in the chest. Is it 14” deep? Maybe not but at 2” diameter, 10” will do just fine.
Yes, at 2 yds the shot will be debilitating; but why would you want/wait for an assailant to get that close? The whole point of a long gun is to be a standoff weapon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/v Jedi View Post
the shell makes it effective at 25 yard range. Tests in these videos show them to be much more effective than a 9mm hollow point.
At 25 yds/75' the average individual isn't going to hit squat with anything but a long gun, caliber notwithstanding, so OK. Even a shotgun is going to be less than optimal, unless it's loaded with a slug. But tests with ballistic gel show that a cut shell isnt going to be very effective at range, regardless of how many plastic buckets get blown up.

Couple more things:
First - if you do use a cut shell it had better be your first shot. There is no way I'd risk/ trust chambering a cut shell from a magazine. It's a recipe for disaster.

Second - for as long as they've been around, if cut shells were that great of a 'thing', why aren't they commercially available? No ammunition maker I know of has ever made them. And you can bet, it there was the slightest truth to cut shells being so great, ammo makers would be all over it, especially in this age of social media fear-mongering.
__________________
"you ain't never smelled diesel 'til you've snorkled a submarine in a tail-wind"
garyfdl is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
Guns


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flare and/or Flare Kit Storage off-the-grid Health, Safety & Related Gear 5 29-09-2009 08:00
Flare-guns and other alternatives (excluding guns) as weapons BlueSovereign Health, Safety & Related Gear 5 26-03-2009 07:01
Flare Gun, flares and smoke flare on a plane? sgtPluck Health, Safety & Related Gear 3 27-08-2008 17:16

Advertise Here
  Vendor Spotlight
No Threads to Display.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.