Canadian COVID-19 News

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by wingssail

Deiseldude, you throw out these stats and numbers without citations and we have no way to read for ourselves to see where you (or the author) has distorted things but what we can find does not correlate to your claims.

If you would like to confirm, please see:

https://www.jccf.ca/manitoba-chief-m...ot-infectious/

It reminds me of Sydney Powell and Rudi Giuliani who carried around arm loads of books and told the world they contained such and so but when it came time to reveal them, it was all fluff and no content.

Why the need to bring in an unrelated matter? What has US election, Sidney Powell, and Rudi Giuliani to do with this discussion? You target public figures who the media have vilified just to discredit evidence in the discussion with which you disagree. This is both a red herring and an ad hominem argument that adds nothing of value.

But since you brought up the subject, did you bother to watch the state legislature hearings on election irregularities that were held in a number of swing states? If not, you have chosen to ignore eye witness testimony of hundreds of witnesses that had been submitted both verbally and by affidavit. Sworn affidavits are certainly not fluff. If falsified, the author is subject to serious penalty for perjury.

Perhaps the most damming evidence presented was a video of illegal ballot counting at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. Media and observers were told that ballot counting had been finished for the night. But after these people left, counting of ballots that had been hidden beneath a table was continued illegally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keANzinHWUA

The hearings certainly revealed many instances of undeniable irregularity and fraud. It is noteworthy that the Trump campaign did not lose court cases on merit. The courts simply rejected cases for procedural excuses, which can be considered as excuse for dereliction of duty. The Judges were not interested in taking the high stakes cases, perhaps out of fear that honest handling of the case could lead to very severe repercussions. The country had just experienced extreme violence in major cities.

Surprisingly, even one main stream media outlet dared to write an article detailing how the election was taken by underhanded means.
The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time

Even the contender admitted to the fraud in a campaign speech.
“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” — Joseph R. Biden

[N Coast Murray]

Originally Posted by Lake-Effect

Sadly, 'Covid Dick' Is Real

The podcast hosts... interviewed a pair of urologists who rightly noted that there’s a clear trail of evidence linking covid-19 to erectile or sexual dysfunction.

antivaxxer rushing to clinic ->

Longest chuckle I've ever gotten from an emoji

[sv_pelagia]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

"It’s confirmed: The pandemic is driven by the faulty PCR tests, just like Pfizer’s ex-Chief Science Officer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, told us months ago.
“Almost all” of the tests for Covid-19 are producing false positives, Dr. Yeadon warns.

Today we learn that 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, 97% never had Covid."

Nothing like believing garbage over truth.

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by sv_pelagia

Nothing like believing garbage over truth.

Where is your evidence to justify your accusation of "garbage" and affirmation of "truth"? You have added nothing of value to the discussion. Perhaps you are stuck in an altered version of reality created by CNN and CBC.

[SailorDoc]

DieselDope is either remarkably naïve or an unconscionable troll. All misinformation and untruths.

Leave him to his own sad life.

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by Mike OReilly

The real issue is that this latest mis/disinformation purveyor is spreading the same old falsehoods that have been used by the anti-vaxx crowd from the get-go. It's all been debunked here probably thousands of times now, but like the virus itself, these folks keep mutating and keep coming back. It just gets exhausting.

It's also fascinating that these folks are mostly either new members, or accounts with very low post numbers. Why?

If this latest poster is honestly interested in learning about Covid-19, then all he has to do is search CF. Of course, the better answer is to go to any of the credible sources for information, like Health Canada, or any of the principal health agencies, or the WHO, or the CDC... But of course, those are all part of the conspiracy, so can't be trusted .

There's little point in engaging. All it will do is drag this thread (once more) into the pig stile, and force the mods to (once again) close it down. I suspect that is the real intent of this poster.

Just ignore him/her/it.

The CDC is certainly not a neutral and independent source. They hold patients on vaccines from which they derive much of their funding. In effect, they are a vaccine marketer. This in addition to other factors that destroy their credibility.


If the WHO is so credible, then why did they parrot the false propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party early in the "pandemic? Claims such as the disease is not transmissible from person to person would be quite comic if the truth were not so deadly. Why do they have a third world Marxist thug as their Director General? The man is responsible for many atrocities in his home country. Perhaps war criminals are ideal pawns, with many hidden closet skeletons that can be exposed at any time. Is it any wonder that the US pulled out of the WHO?



Health Canada has flip flopped so many times that their credibility is reduced to zero. Early on, banning flights from the hot spots of China and Italy was said to be ineffective. Then international, inter provincial, and even local travel was banned or drastically limited. Masks were said to be ineffective. Then masks were mandated.


How can anyone with even average intelligence not see such inconsistencies that destroy the credibility of your "credible sources". Your reference to "debunked" cites no sources, so lacks credibility. The zombie followers of official narrative always insert the word "debunk" in their argument, but they never quote a source. Another tactic is the use of the words "misinformation" and "disinformation" without any backing to support. And of course the traditional ad hominem word "anti-vaxx" is always tossed in. This trite label adds nothing to the discussion.


These people use the same old overworked words and weak arguments, but really say nothing. They like to quote their worshiped sources without realizing their lack of credibility. Official source does not necessarily equate to credible source.


If you have to resort to the same old trite arguments and expressions, then you really have nothing original or informative to offer. You seem to be acting like a paid agent for big pharma. Do you wear a black suit and dark shades on the job, sort a like a legendary secret agent man in black?

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

The CDC is certainly not a neutral and independent source. They hold patients on vaccines from which they derive much of their funding. In effect, they are a vaccine marketer. This in addition to other factors that destroy their credibility...

Pure Bullshti!

The fact that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] holds patents is taken out of context.
The CDC licences technology, developed at the CDC, to third parties, and in some cases, this technology is partly patented. While the CDC receives royalties from licensees, many of which cover technology used in the process of developing or manufacturing vaccines, this doesn’t mean that the CDC makes money from selling vaccines.

In fact, the CDC gives away vaccines, for free [‘Vaccines for Children’, worth $4.6 billion, in 2019].

The reason for [the CDC] filing a patent is that, without patent protection, someone else could patent the technology instead, and prevent others from using it.

In 2019, the CDC received $17 Million, in total royalties, from patented and unpatented technologies, out of a total budget of $12.1 Billion.
For comparison, the CDC Foundation received more than $87 million in philanthropic contributions [public gifts].


➥ https://www.cdc.gov/funding/document...apshot-508.pdf
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/index.html
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...disclosure.htm
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...chnologies.htm

[Mike OReilly]

I'm choosing to ignore this latest disinformation troll. I strongly suggest everyone do the same.

Ignore him, or put him on your ignore list. His only goal is to spread false information, and to make people angry. Don't help him.

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by SailorDoc

DieselDope is either remarkably naïve or an unconscionable troll. All misinformation and untruths.

Leave him to his own sad life.

Another ad hominem statement with no material to back it, completely unqualified. You think that you can win with childish name calling? It is difficult to believe that you are really a doctor as your name implies. But lots of doctors are only apologists for big pharma who controls their profession from the first day of med school until retirement. They are glorified order clerks for the industry, prescribing expensive pills for every ailment. Their provincial or state college of physicians and surgeons keeps a muzzle on their mouth and a leash on their neck. If they dare say or do anything to offend their handlers, they lose their license. Must be a frustrating job, but they are well paid and enjoy prestige, so a they have a comfy gig.

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

Another ad hominem statement with no material to back it, completely unqualified...

How about trying to rebut my #3817?

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by GordMay

Pure Bullshti!

The fact that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] holds patents is taken out of context.
The CDC licences technology, developed at the CDC, to third parties, and in some cases, this technology is partly patented. While the CDC receives royalties from licensees, many of which cover technology used in the process of developing or manufacturing vaccines, this doesn’t mean that the CDC makes money from selling vaccines.

In fact, the CDC gives away vaccines, for free [‘Vaccines for Children’, worth $4.6 billion, in 2019].

The reason for [the CDC] filing a patent is that, without patent protection, someone else could patent the technology instead, and prevent others from using it.

In 2019, the CDC received $17 Million, in total royalties, from patented and unpatented technologies, out of a total budget of $12.1 Billion.
For comparison, the CDC Foundation received more than $87 million in philanthropic contributions [public gifts].


➥ https://www.cdc.gov/funding/document...apshot-508.pdf
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/index.html
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...disclosure.htm
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...chnologies.htm

Another childish statement: "********". How do you think that you can add to a discussion with such rudeness? Your evidence only confirms my point that the CDC is in a conflict of interest by deriving revenue from vaccine sales. Their credibility is compromised. And just who are their philanthropic contributors, and what influence do they exert? Would be interesting to see who is on that list. The old expression,"follow the money" certainly applies here.

[Greg K]

Originally Posted by GordMay

Pure Bullshti!

The fact that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] holds patents is taken out of context.
The CDC licences technology, developed at the CDC, to third parties, and in some cases, this technology is partly patented. While the CDC receives royalties from licensees, many of which cover technology used in the process of developing or manufacturing vaccines, this doesn’t mean that the CDC makes money from selling vaccines.

In fact, the CDC gives away vaccines, for free [‘Vaccines for Children’, worth $4.6 billion, in 2019].

The reason for [the CDC] filing a patent is that, without patent protection, someone else could patent the technology instead, and prevent others from using it.

In 2019, the CDC received $17 Million, in total royalties, from patented and unpatented technologies, out of a total budget of $12.1 Billion.
For comparison, the CDC Foundation received more than $87 million in philanthropic contributions [public gifts].


➥ https://www.cdc.gov/funding/document...apshot-508.pdf
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/index.html
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...disclosure.htm
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/te...chnologies.htm

Sadly, through no fault of your own, you and others here are poorly informed Gord. I urge anyone who has a genuine interest in finding out the truth about the NIAID, the CDC and the FDA to temporarily suspend any preconceived impressions you may have about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and read his current book. It is well worth your time and effort.

https://www.simonandschuster.com/boo.../9781510766808

[danstanford]

For what it is worth, I am fairly happy when an entity like the CDC change their minds. Instead of ruining their credibility I believe it adds to it by showing they are still looking and learning.

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

Another childish statement: "********". How do you think that you can add to a discussion with such rudeness? Your evidence only confirms my point that the CDC is in a conflict of interest by deriving revenue from vaccine sales. Their credibility is compromised. And just who are their philanthropic contributors [1], and what influence do they exert? Would be interesting to see who is on that list. The old expression,"follow the money" certainly applies here.

The CDC does not accept gifts if the conditions imposed by the donor are any of the following:
• Illegal
• Contrary to public policy
• Unreasonable to administer
• Contrary to generally accepted public standards
• An actual conflict of interest
• An apparent conflict of interest to a reasonable perso
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/partners/gift-funding.html
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/maso/Policy/ADMI...DC-gov_508.pdf

I'm sure you'll conjure up some evil corrupt influence, from the list of donors, but here you go:
[1] GENERAL CONDITIONAL AND UNCONDITIONAL GIFTS TO CDC FISCAL YEAR 2020 [OCTOBER 1, 2019 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2020]
➥ https://www.cdc.gov/partners/pdf/Fis...fts-to-CDC.pdf
FISCAL YEAR 2019 ➥ https://www.cdc.gov/partners/pdf/Fis...fts-to-CDC.pdf

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by Mike OReilly

I'm choosing to ignore this latest disinformation troll. I strongly suggest everyone do the same.

Ignore him, or put him on your ignore list. His only goal is to spread false information, and to make people angry. Don't help him.

Another statement with no evidence to back it. The "woke" proponents generally use their trite expression, "disinformation" and fail to offer anything to support it. If you have not offered qualified evidence, you really have nothing to say. You have been able to offer no evidence against mine. You are admitting defeat. The country, and indeed the world is full of CNN and CBC believers who think that they are getting true information. Big news media lost their credibility in 1975 when the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (the Church Committee) revealed that they work in cooperation with intelligence agencies to spread false information.


I generally give supporting evidence, but now you advise members to self censor the truth. Seems that you enjoy living in your bubble of fake news and propaganda.