Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Monohull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30-10-2019, 18:33   #136
KTP
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 441
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Ok, thanks for the information. Yes we need to find a S, X and M and sit in them and compare. We plan on motoring only, so I would get rid of all of the rigging and mast, add quite a bit of solar and use a gas outboard along with a Torqeedo 1103 electric to power the boat. We sail our Pacific Seacraft 34 and our Montgomery 17 but the PSC34 is too big for the loop (and hard to get there from Seattle) and the Montgomery 17 is really not big enough for more than 1 week or so living onboard.

I was thinking of having a rigid bimini made up of four 300 watt panels and then having a four foot stripe of panels down the middle of the boat, leaving a small pathway on each side and at the bow for handling lines and anchor. Something around 1600 to 2000 watts of solar. The Torqeedo 1103 runs well on 1000 watts input (pushes our Montgomery 17 which is about 1700 pounds at over 4.5 knots in calm water. It would be quite pleasant to do stretches of the loop in silence and then crank up the 9.9 outboard motor for other stretches.
KTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 05:46   #137
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 2
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

New to this forum and really enjoying the comments and advice. Apart from the few that went off on a tangent about water sailing">blue water sailing, rounding the horn, racing etc I have found this thread very helpful as I am currently in a similar situation. Spent my life around and in the water with some limited sailing, currently looking for a trailer sailer to get my family out on the water for summer adventures.

We have several popular trailer sailers here in New Zealand, such as the Noelex 22, 25 & 30ft but I have been looking at the Macgregor 26M (2007?) also. I am aware of the compromises but as has been mentioned I am just wanting to get out on the water, coastal cruising in relatively protected waters with the wife and kids, teaching them to sail, swimming, snorkelling, exploring and basically just having fun. We live a very "outdoors" life and this will just be an extension to it. Need something affordable and transportable, love the idea of a keeler but just not an option at the moment with the costs and logistics involved.
Kiwi-Jase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 06:05   #138
Moderator
 
Pete7's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 18,597
Images: 21
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Jase,

Also welcome to the forum Sounds like a trailer yacht could be just the thing especially when you consider how far you can go on a good road at 60mph. That's a new cruising ground in a few hours or take it home for the winter.

Pete
Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 06:12   #139
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 2
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7 View Post
Jase,

Also welcome to the forum Sounds like a trailer yacht could be just the thing especially when you consider how far you can go on a good road at 60mph. That's a new cruising ground in a few hours or take it home for the winter.

Pete
Thanks Pete. Yes we have access to some amazing places here in the North Island, hence the appeal of the trailer sailer. Currently looking into a 6 day sailing course in the Bay of Islands and then it will be time time pull the trigger on a boat! Cheers.
Kiwi-Jase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 07:09   #140
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Boat: MacGregor 26X
Posts: 14
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

If there are any MacGregor 26X available you might check it out. We like the floor plan better and motor and sail in waters where the depth can be uncertain. The swing keel is better if you hit anything, and we have, but sailing is a bit better with the M daggerboard. Wife likes the breeze in vee berth for sleeping and we put kids under cockpit. M is kinda short for that. M is roomier on a rainy day when galley slid back.
Make sure wind is not over 10 knots on the first dozen times you take wife and kids out. Macs move around a lot in wind and waves and can feel unsafe so let family get used to it!
nedmiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 07:11   #141
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 50,091
Images: 241
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Greetings and welcome aboard the CF, Kiwi-Jase.
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 07:18   #142
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Boat: MacGregor 26X
Posts: 14
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

If you get a Mac 26x plan on modifying the steering if it is still factory. It isn’t difficult and makes a lot of difference.
nedmiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 08:28   #143
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern MD, Chesapeake Bay
Boat: Catalina & Maycraft
Posts: 996
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwi-Jase View Post
.... I am aware of the compromises but as has been mentioned I am just wanting to get out on the water, coastal cruising in relatively protected waters with the wife and kids, teaching them to sail, swimming, snorkelling, exploring and basically just having fun. We live a very "outdoors" life and this will just be an extension to it. Need something affordable and transportable, love the idea of a keeler but just not an option at the moment with the costs and logistics involved.

That's what's great about these trailerable sailboats. They're affordable for a lot of people, and it's sure more memorable to kids than staring at a video screen for fun, IMO. If more families made a hobby of it - getting out together for weekends on the water, I think it would also help in keeping facilities nice for sailors, and a healthy regard for the environment.
Hardhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 08:30   #144
rbk
Registered User
 
rbk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Boat: T37
Posts: 2,337
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Also try the Macgregorsailors.com owners website. They just got it back up and running.
rbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 08:40   #145
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Vancouver B.C.Canada
Boat: Century Raven 17'
Posts: 436
Images: 1
Send a message via MSN to BugzyCan
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

There are several Mac Facebook pages as well, good active participation.

The Mac isn't going to win any sailing races, but it can sail, great to learn on, and you can anchor in where no keel boat can venture, even tie up on the beach. With the X or M you can also motor past all of those sailboats to get to the moorage first if so inclined.
BugzyCan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 10:05   #146
Registered User

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake Ont
Posts: 8,561
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Quote:
Originally Posted by nedmiller View Post
If you get a Mac 26x plan on modifying the steering if it is still factory. It isn’t difficult and makes a lot of difference.

Does this mod make the boat track better under motor? My friend has a 26M and at planing speed, I found that it didn't hold course very well. It seemed to wander a bit (more than other planing boats I've driven), requiring a sort of back and forth helming.
Lake-Effect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 10:27   #147
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Boat: MacGregor 26X
Posts: 14
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

The Mac 26X is different from the 26M so the steering mod would not work.
Both boats have much flatter bottoms than a motorboat that is made just for planing. They are semi-displacement hulls and thus not as efficient as displacement hulls and don’t plane as well as planing hull. No mod will make them plane as well as a non sailing boat and no mod will make them sail like a sailing boat...but they do both well enough.
If you aren’t going to trailer, buy a heavier boat. If you are not going to sail and ok with going below hull speed very efficiently, buy a displacement trawler...not sail and want to go fast, buy a boat designed to do that.
nedmiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 10:40   #148
rbk
Registered User
 
rbk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Boat: T37
Posts: 2,337
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

The steering mod beefs up the weak factory setup. As mentioned above they are a mix of displacement/planning hull; key with this is to either keep it at or below hull speed or on full step. It’s when you’re in between the hull wanders terribly.
rbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 13:20   #149
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Boat: 1980 Pacific International Marine 41.5
Posts: 710
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Theres been a few mac's that I've seen. Their rigging is questionable in size, but so is Beneteau's rigging size.

I've seen them out when the water is "rougher" and they seem to be quite an uncomfortable ride.

Seeing them during flat calm days seems like they move okay but definitely not nearly as good as a true sailboat
chowdan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2019, 14:00   #150
rbk
Registered User
 
rbk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Boat: T37
Posts: 2,337
Re: Is the macgregor 26 on Sea really so bad as they say

Quote:
Originally Posted by chowdan View Post
Theres been a few mac's that I've seen. Their rigging is questionable in size, but so is Beneteau's rigging size.

I've seen them out when the water is "rougher" and they seem to be quite an uncomfortable ride.

Seeing them during flat calm days seems like they move okay but definitely not nearly as good as a true sailboat
10-20 knts is fine in a Mac. We ran one for 8 years in SE Alaska. They are light and the rigging has a huge safety factor and can get bouncy in weather. We did tons of SC advisories which were mostly rather fun sailing. Also a couple of moderate gales which were white knuckles but not dangerous.
rbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
grass, macgregor


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beware people who say they have a Captains License but do not. Captain Graham Our Community 112 09-01-2019 05:24
They say we're crazy! Thelmalou222 Meets & Greets 21 11-07-2016 11:56
Is this what They Mean when They Say to Taper the Hole ? off-the-grid Construction, Maintenance & Refit 11 18-05-2010 15:29
Home Depot Plumbing fittings - just bad or really bad? neelie Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 34 11-11-2008 17:21

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:38.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.