Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > The Fleet > Monohull Sailboats
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 23-09-2021, 14:54   #16
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,989
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

We owned a Tartan 44 and sailed it thousands of miles offshore through the South Pacific and North Pacific, like all Tartans it had a well designed bolt on keel and a proper keel stub unlike the cheaper high production boats that simply bolt the keel directly on the flat bottomed hulls. Like all boats no matter the keel design the boats need proper maintenance but because the Tartan is a stick built boat and not a liner boat it’s quite easy to properly inspect the interior floor supports and the exterior for past damage. The Scheel keel is a decent design for shallow draft boats and allows a wide base to install bolts. It will cut your windward performance by at least 5 degrees so a much better cruiser than racer. It does allow you to get into skinny waters. Tartans are well designed and well built but your buying the past owners as much as the boat. If it was carefully looked after and upgraded you might have found a real winner but get a real good surveyor who is knowledgeable with the breed. Good luck with your shopping!
robert sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 14:54   #17
Registered User
 
Orion Jim's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Noank, Ct. USA
Boat: Cape Dory 31
Posts: 3,215
Images: 8
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

Regardless of the type of keel keep in mind you are looking at a boat built in 89. Constant maintenance and regular updating/upgrading will be the key issues. Take no ones word for anything. If a claim cannot be backed up with documentation it is worthless banter. An overdue refit of the existing systems would be outrageously expensive. Sails, standing/running rigging, engine/transmission, wiring, breaker panels, pumps, hoses, water/diesel tanks, galley stoves, heads……all require testing and a thorough review. It is imperative that you hire a competent surveyor…some are…..some are not. The original purchase price of a boat in it’s thirties is just the start if it has not been cared for properly.
Orion Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 16:55   #18
Marine Service Provider
 
Snore's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Boat: Retired Delivery Capt
Posts: 3,706
Send a message via Skype™ to Snore
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

Let’s start with it is a TARTAN, not a lesser brand. There are many 40+ year old Tartans out there sailing all sorts of places.

I admit I am admittedly biased. But my advice is always the same to any older boat buyer- “You buy original build quality and everything that was done/happened to her since then.”

The Tartans are all very well built. My suggestion is to join the Facebook group or tartanownerslist@groups.io. The Tartan owners are an amiable group, those of us who owner the older girls work together to keep them going strong.
__________________
"Whenever...it requires a strong moral principle to prevent me from deliberately stepping into the street, and methodically knocking people's hats off- then, I account it high time to get to sea..." Ishmael
Snore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 17:45   #19
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 691
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

The Tartan 40 was designed by Sparkman & Stevens who were conservative
designers. I have a Tartan 43 (1974 build) (Think early 70's Tartan 41 with traditional Transom). I have one of the few centerboard versions with 11000
lb keel with a centerboard within. Did a Atlantic circle in 2017/2018. when it was 45 yrs old. Yes get it surveyed but you're ahead of the game as it was designed by S & S and build by Tartan.
maine50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 17:53   #20
Registered User
 
malbert73's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Boat: Tartan 40
Posts: 2,481
To Tartan or not to Tartan

I own a Tartan 40. Awesome boat in every regard. I seriously doubt the earlier poster who knew of a T40 losing its keel. The keel stub goes pretty deep and is wide, and the keel is like 8-10 long and only 3 feet deep below keel stub. There are more than 10 well spaced keel bolts.
We’ve owned ours for 7 seasons and have cruised nearly 8000 miles. Very easily driven, and seakindly and stiff. The compromises are in the interior which seems small compared to modern 40 footers but is very liveable. It has great storage and very good quality workmanship
malbert73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 18:47   #21
Registered User
 
Sailmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston
Boat: ‘01 Catana 401
Posts: 9,626
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

[QUOTE=Cap Morgan;3488605]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Jackson View Post



Stu,



I must admit that my understanding of this is based on my boat shopping experience and related articles when I do research. Are there any manufacturers producing encapsulated keels anymore, especially with lead?


The only current manufacturer that comes to mind with an encapsulated keel is island packet. Not even in the same ballpark where performance comes in…..this is coming from a guy who owns a 45 year old encapsulated boat, our next will be bolt on.
Sailmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2021, 19:13   #22
Registered User

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,640
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

I've owned boats with bolt on keels and boats with encapsulated keels. Neither caused problems. Keel type would be about #58 on my criteria list when buying a 30 year old sailboat.

#1 is how good was the builder (Tartan is well above average)
#2 is how well has it been maintained by the PO's

Don't have too many "required" items on your list that you read about on the internet - or you will end up compromising on #1 and #2. Any boat that's still floating after 30 years has passed the basic tests...

But all 30 year old boats will have issues -- some of which will be missed in the survey. Budget spending $25K+ during the first 12 months of ownership to make it the boat you and your wife will love.

When buying boats - "The perfect is the enemy of the good"
CarlF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 08:58   #23
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Philadelphia
Boat: Hinckley 59
Posts: 146
Send a message via AIM to caffel
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

As you my hove found out by now a lot of strong designs have keel bolts in addition to the external fiberglass.
And juts where would you attach the lightning ground straps if you didn't have those bolts ?
caffel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 09:12   #24
Retired musician & 50T master
 
Symphony's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ct
Boat: Pisces 21
Posts: 708
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

I previously sailed a 1986 tartan 34-2 and a 1999 tartan 4100 all around the eastern seaboard.
I checked the torque on the keelboats in my initial survey. I never thought about them again. The Scheel Keel is a genius design.
As it stated in the above posts, Tartans are stick built which means you can get to repairing anything on the boat with less surgery than required on liner boats.

Not only do Tartans look beautiful and sail well, a clean Tartan is very easy to sell. Both of mine sold almost immediately.
__________________
"In my experience travelers generally exaggerate the difficulties of the way." - Thoreau
Symphony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 09:32   #25
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Long Island
Boat: Tartan 37C
Posts: 171
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

1980 Tartan 37 owner here. Buy the boat and go sailing. Tartans are the preverbal Brick ---- House! In fact invite me for a sail, I would love to go!. If you have ANY question in your mind about the structural integrity of the keel, bolts, when the boat is on the hard, replace the keel bolts. Factor 75% of that cost into your offer. If you replace the keel bolts you know that it was done correctly and there should be no issues while you are in custody of the boat.
Fair winds and following seas
Captain Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 10:05   #26
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 762
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

If keel bolts are pulled and inspected regularly and if you hit something, bolted on keels allow you better performance into the wind,. The is nothing wrong with them as they make the boat preform better. See what the surveyor says as I am sure we would all like to know the outcome.
Stewie12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 10:31   #27
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: LI, NY,USA
Boat: 2010 Jeanneau SO 44i
Posts: 802
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

If you plan on hitting a lot of stuff underwater with your vessel you should definitely stay away from fin keels.
Kd9truck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 11:53   #28
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North East USA
Boat: 1975 Tartan 41'
Posts: 1,052
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDabs View Post
I'd care more about the hull being balsa cored than the keel being bolted on, just me tho.

That being said- I am a huge fan of Tartan's and I think the Tartan 40 is a great cruising sailboat
I believe the core is limited to above the waterline, which is a good compromise for performance and safety
zstine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 12:13   #29
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North East USA
Boat: 1975 Tartan 41'
Posts: 1,052
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

Torquing the keel bolts exceeds their operational loading by many, many times. So, If you can torque them to spec and they do not fail, then you should be good to go....
Email below From Tartan...



"Keelbolt Torque 6/21/02

Good morning [all]. It appears the [folks here] have been busy coming up with
questions regarding our keel installations which have been surfacing
ever since I've been monitoring the list. I hope the following will answer
some of your questions:

Tartan uses a "Live" joint to mate the keel to the hull.

A live joint is a joint that is able to flex during thermal expansion and
contraction as well as accommodate movement in the structure while
normally loaded as well as those occasional abnormal loads (grounding).

This installation has been in use since the early 1960's with great success.
One of the great advantages of this installation is that tightening the
keel bolts will not promote water intrusion.

We use a two-part THIOKOL adhesive sealant between the keel to hull
joint which creates a permanent gasket. As you know, gaskets
are used elsewhere on your boat such as on the engine water pump.

Tightening the bolts on gasketed seals does not promote leaks as long
as the bolts are evenly torqued.

Keel bolts should be torqued to the following specifications:
1" bolts should be maintained at 350 ft/lbs
3/4" bolts at 250 ft/lbs and
1/2" bolts at 180 ft lbs.

Tartan no longer covers up the keel to hull joint with glass tape for cosmetic
purposes. For the last several years we have been leaving the seam
exposed and faired with a THIOKOL bead to eliminate the maintenance
issues with glass tape. Some other manufacturers install their
keels with an epoxy joint. We don't find this to be reliable since
the lead will expand and contract at a different rate than the
fiberglass. If the bolts become loose the joint will fail and there is no
chance of tightening up the bolts to eliminate a leak. A sudden
impact can also jar the joint enough to break the bond.

There you have it. I hope I answered all the keel joint questions.
George Gulden"
zstine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2021, 12:15   #30
Moderator
 
Pete7's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Solent, England
Boat: Moody 31
Posts: 18,596
Images: 22
Re: To Tartan or not to Tartan

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kd9truck View Post
If you plan on hitting a lot of stuff underwater with your vessel you should definitely stay away from fin keels.
At last some real advice and as you point out hitting stuff underwater will be a disaster for a fin. Just watch this from 5 minutes onwards to see the result.

Pete


Pete7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
420: 420 inverter issues. Our inverter is not working and we are not able to find a manual EW-WE Lagoon Catamarans 5 15-04-2020 07:04
Is it not unlucky if you translate a boat's name, not change it? mrchristian Flotsam & Sailing Miscellany 20 16-01-2015 00:39
SHE DID NOT SINK! or How NOT to do plumbing sanibel sailor Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 19 02-04-2013 07:57
Question is how it can be allowed , not to do or not to do ?? Wavewacker Rules of the Road, Regulations & Red Tape 24 06-02-2012 09:14
Posts Not Being Marked Read - Probably Not a Problem w/CF . . . dacust Forum Tech Support & Site Help 2 02-10-2010 07:53

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:08.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.