Cruisers Forum
 


Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 14-11-2019, 11:26   #46
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by newhaul View Post

The issue is it doesn't cover ablative paints on boats its classic government overreach .

RCW 90.48.080
Discharge of polluting matter in waters prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person to throw, drain, run, or otherwise discharge into any of the waters of this state, or to cause, permit or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep or otherwise discharged into such waters any organic or inorganic matter that shall cause or tend to cause pollution of such waters according to the determination of the department, as provided for in this chapter
How in the world could you conclude that does not apply to toxic bottom paint on boats? It's inorganic matter that tends to cause pollution. Copper is about to be banned for it, TBT already was.
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2019, 11:27   #47
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

fstbttms, I was curious about your opinion of non-toxic alternatives, specifically silicone based anti-fouling like Seacoat Sea-Speed V 10 X and AST SLIPS N1x. Do you have any experience with them? Is it all hype?

Asking because I'm also in WA and looking for a long lasting coating that I can maintain myself and won't have to reapply ever other season. I can't touch ablatives in-water without polluting, and I understand hard paints can go bad out of the water for extended periods. Is that also the case with Trinidad SR?

Being limited to the Sound (for now at least) I'm not too concerned about absolute performance as fouling isn't so intense here.
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2019, 11:57   #48
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,245
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrena View Post
How in the world could you conclude that does not apply to toxic bottom paint on boats? It's inorganic matter that tends to cause pollution. Copper is about to be banned for it, TBT already was.
perhaps you should actually read the rcw it was written concerning storm water collection systems and resultant runoff .

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=90.48.080

If it were actually ment to be pertaining to the modern material concerns they would have updated it sometime in the last 32 years.
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2019, 15:19   #49
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
RCW 90.48.010
Policy enunciated.
It is declared to be the public policy of the state of Washington to maintain the highest possible standards to insure the purity of all waters of the state consistent with public health and public enjoyment thereof, the propagation and protection of wild life, birds, game, fish and other aquatic life, and the industrial development of the state, and to that end require the use of all known available and reasonable methods by industries and others to prevent and control the pollution of the waters of the state of Washington...
Quote:
RCW 90.48.020
Definitions.
Whenever the word "person" is used in this chapter, it shall be construed to include any political subdivision, government agency, municipality, industry, public or private corporation, copartnership, association, firm, individual or any other entity whatsoever.
Wherever the words "waters of the state" shall be used in this chapter, they shall be construed to include lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters and watercourses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
Whenever the word "pollution" is used in this chapter, it shall be construed to mean such contamination, or other alteration of the physical, chemical or biological properties, of any waters of the state, including change in temperature, taste, color, turbidity, or odor of the waters, or such discharge of any liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substance into any waters of the state as will or is likely to create a nuisance or render such waters harmful, detrimental or injurious to the public health, safety or welfare, or to domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural, recreational, or other legitimate beneficial uses, or to livestock, wild animals, birds, fish or other aquatic life...
Quote:
RCW 90.48.080
Discharge of polluting matter in waters prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person to throw, drain, run, or otherwise discharge into any of the waters of this state, or to cause, permit or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep or otherwise discharged into such waters any organic or inorganic matter that shall cause or tend to cause pollution of such waters according to the determination of the department, as provided for in this chapter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newhaul View Post
perhaps you should actually read the rcw it was written concerning storm water collection systems and resultant runoff ...

If it were actually ment to be pertaining to the modern material concerns they would have updated it sometime in the last 32 years.
The thing is that's obviously not true. It's clearly about any kind of pollution in any water within Washington. Known polluting chemicals clouding off of a hull counts as "otherwise discharged into the waters of the state." While not explicitly included in the definitions section, the relevant definition of discharge here is: something sent forth or emitted.

The RCW hasn't been updated in over 30 years because it's already universally worded. They don't need to update the wording since any change to the waters of the state is in scope, and the department determines what's a pollutant in the first place.

Pollution is just bad m'kay!
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2019, 19:22   #50
Hull Diver
 
fstbttms's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Under a boat, in a marina, in the San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,462
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrena View Post
fstbttms, I was curious about your opinion of non-toxic alternatives, specifically silicone based anti-fouling like Seacoat Sea-Speed V 10 X and AST SLIPS N1x. Do you have any experience with them? Is it all hype?
I do not have personal experience with either of the products you mentioned and there's a reason for that. Nobody is using them. And there's a reason that, as well. But for clarity's sake, neither are anti fouling paint. They are better described as "foul release" coatings and are a different animal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrena View Post
Asking because I'm also in WA and looking for a long lasting coating that I can maintain myself and won't have to reapply ever other season. I can't touch ablatives in-water without polluting, and I understand hard paints can go bad out of the water for extended periods. Is that also the case with Trinidad SR?
Yes, Pettit Trinidad cannot be exposed to air for extended periods. But it is a long-lasting paint. Up there I think that 3-4 years of good performance wouldn't be hard to achieve from that paint. Are you hauling your boat annually for some reason?
fstbttms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2019, 19:43   #51
Hull Diver
 
fstbttms's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Under a boat, in a marina, in the San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,462
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

BTW- by the letter of the law (specifically RCW 90.48.080), metal-based anti fouling paint of any kind is illegal to use in Washington, as they all leach toxins into the water 24/7/365, be they ablative, hard or otherwise.
fstbttms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 08:52   #52
Registered User
 
01kiwijohn's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Tacoma, Washington, USA
Boat: Casacde 36
Posts: 596
Images: 1
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

I think I'll just go for a sail up to British Columbia and re-paint the bottom while I'm there
01kiwijohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 09:50   #53
Senior Cruiser
 
newhaul's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: puget sound washington
Boat: 1968 Islander bahama 24 hull 182, 1963 columbia 29 defender. hull # 60
Posts: 12,245
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by fstbttms View Post
BTW- by the letter of the law (specifically RCW 90.48.080), metal-based anti fouling paint of any kind is illegal to use in Washington, as they all leach toxins into the water 24/7/365, be they ablative, hard or otherwise.
by the letter of that law anything you put in the water is illegal ( it would even be illegal for you to go for a swim)
__________________
Non illigitamus carborundum
newhaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 10:08   #54
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Not quite. I'm not going to quote it again but you can scroll up to see how the term pollution is explicitly defined in chapter 90.48. Known pollutants are further defined by the Department of Ecology.

Swimming in the water doesn't meet these criteria, and people (surprisingly) are not yet defined as known pollutants.

fstbttms is technically correct, and I suspect that may have something to do with the coming ban on copper paints.
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 10:17   #55
Hull Diver
 
fstbttms's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Under a boat, in a marina, in the San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,462
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrena View Post
fstbttms is technically correct, and I suspect that may have something to do with the coming ban on copper paints.


Except that the replacement biocide once copper has been legislated out of anti fouling paint (assuming that actually comes to pass) will be zinc, which is also a heavy metal.
fstbttms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 10:25   #56
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by fstbttms View Post
Are you hauling your boat annually for some reason?
No, but I'd like to have the option of hauling out without consequence as my vessel is technically trailer-able. Still researching what's best for me. Currently hauled for the winter while under restoration/refit.

I like the idea of foul-release even if I have to dive my boat before every outing (I say that now) but without much first-hand experience to reference, it's hard to say if it's even close to acceptable in reality (marketing notwithstanding).

Quote:
Originally Posted by fstbttms View Post
Except that the replacement biocide once copper has been legislated out of anti fouling paint (assuming that actually comes to pass) will be zinc, which is also a heavy metal.
Oh jeeze, I heard there were concerns about replacements ending up being more toxic, I didn't realize they are zinc-based. I thought the focus was more on foul-release coatings...
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 11:09   #57
Hull Diver
 
fstbttms's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Under a boat, in a marina, in the San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,462
Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrena View Post

Oh jeeze, I heard there were concerns about replacements ending up being more toxic, I didn't realize they are zinc-based. I thought the focus was more on foul-release coatings...

Zinc (as it applies to anti fouling paint) is not more toxic than copper, in fact zinc is much less effective as a biocide. This why it is a replacement for and not currently in widespread use.
fstbttms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 11:26   #58
Registered User
 
wrena's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Boat: 1974 Miller 28, hull #10
Posts: 12
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

Quote:
Originally Posted by fstbttms View Post
Zinc (as it applies to anti fouling paint) is not more toxic than copper...
Ah, perhaps the alternatives mentioned in this DOE publication are referring to something else, but they don't go into specifics:
Quote:
...an Ecology review found that available alternatives to copper paints could actually do more harm to the environment...
wrena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 11:31   #59
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SoCal
Boat: Formosa 30 ketch
Posts: 1,014
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

"Whenever the word "pollution" is used in this chapter, it shall be construed to mean such contamination, or other alteration of the physical, chemical or biological properties, of any waters of the state, including change in temperature"

I guess everybody will have to go to air cooled inboards

There must be a requirement that the people who dream up these regulations have an IQ of less than 75
Bill Seal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2019, 12:08   #60
Registered User
 
senormechanico's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2003
Boat: Dragonfly 1000 trimaran
Posts: 7,228
Re: Bottom Paint in Washington State-Help!

So anything moving through the water will heat it by friction causing change in temperature.
NO more boating for anybody !
__________________
'You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.

Mae West
senormechanico is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bottom paint, paint, washing, Washington


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Washington State Copper Paint Law foggysail Construction, Maintenance & Refit 273 17-01-2012 14:04
Washington State purchase with out-of-state residence cyclepro Dollars & Cents 7 06-06-2011 08:55

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:58.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.