Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Construction, Maintenance & Refit
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

View Poll Results: Flanged vs inline? I'm comfortable with this style of valves:
Only flanged seacocks 15 62.50%
Properly installed inline valves 8 33.33%
Other (explain in comments) 1 4.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-03-2018, 20:07   #31
Moderator
 
Jammer's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Boat: Tartan 3800
Posts: 5,171
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

I am in the process of replacing two ball valves with seacocks. One of them had failed and was leaking.

<<< it's all just speculation >>>

Decades of actual field experience is not speculation. Proper seacocks have a good reputation that goes back years and years. Inline valves do not.

<<< 500 pounds >>>

Any resilient object of reasonable weight (20+ pounds) that is dropped or thrown can exert this much force. It is not a hypothetical scenario.

<<< Marelon >>>

It's your boat, do what you want.

Properly installed and with minimal maintenance, bronze seacocks should last the life of the hull, and often do.

My experience with plastic valves of various kinds is that they deteriorate over time due to cumulative exposure to the atmosphere, the sun, fluids, temperature changes, etc. As noted upthread dimensional stability is a problem. Cold flow is also a problem. Loss of plasticizers over time is a problem, as noted in the case of schedule 80 PVC upthread. Migration of components within the material is a problem. Maybe the Marelon ones solve all that. I am skeptical and am unconvinced that they solve any problem that I actually have with bronze.
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 20:28   #32
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Boat: O'Day 40
Posts: 1,084
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammer View Post
I am in the process of replacing two ball valves with seacocks. One of them had failed and was leaking.

<<< it's all just speculation >>>

Decades of actual field experience is not speculation. Proper seacocks have a good reputation that goes back years and years. Inline valves do not.

<<< 500 pounds >>>

Any resilient object of reasonable weight (20+ pounds) that is dropped or thrown can exert this much force. It is not a hypothetical scenario.

<<< Marelon >>>

It's your boat, do what you want.

Properly installed and with minimal maintenance, bronze seacocks should last the life of the hull, and often do.

My experience with plastic valves of various kinds is that they deteriorate over time due to cumulative exposure to the atmosphere, the sun, fluids, temperature changes, etc. As noted upthread dimensional stability is a problem. Cold flow is also a problem. Loss of plasticizers over time is a problem, as noted in the case of schedule 80 PVC upthread. Migration of components within the material is a problem. Maybe the Marelon ones solve all that. I am skeptical and am unconvinced that they solve any problem that I actually have with bronze.
Trudesign are NOT Marelon. They won't have "migration of components" any more than your hull does.

They will NOT "cold flow" any more than your hull does.

They meet the same ABYC impact standard as bronze.

Your comparison with plastic valves is just plain silly.
__________________
Trying to make new mistakes.
bcboomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 21:11   #33
Marine Service Provider
 
boatpoker's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Credit, Ontario or Bahamas
Boat: Benford 38 Fantail Cruiser
Posts: 7,297
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tessellate View Post
This really seems like a concern about electrolysis, which is legitimate but is an argument for using Marelon, because both inline bronze and flanged bronze are susceptible to electrolysis.
Please explain how hair removal (electrolysis) or hydrogen fuel cell (electrolysis) has anything to do with this.
__________________
If you're not laughing, you're not doin' it right.
boatpoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 21:39   #34
Registered User

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami Florida
Boat: Ellis Flybridge 28
Posts: 4,071
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress Sirena View Post
after having encountered a few frozen ball valve"seacocks "I will choose the cone style bronze sea cocks when I can find them.
Having encountered a lot of frozen tapered cone seacocks, that require a hammer and other tools to free, I will always choose a ball valve type seacock.

While ball valves do freeze, I’ve never found one I couldn’t free with just a little extra leverage. It’s also pretty easy to prevent a ball valve from freezing. Just open and close it a couple of times a year.

On a tapered cone you have a huge area of bronze to bronze contact that can corrode and cause the valve to freeze. A ball valve has a tiny area of chrome or stainless in contact with Teflon like material. It just doesn’t have enough area to freeze as tightly as a tapered cone.

This doesn’t seem to be true for Marlon ball valve seacocks. I have seen the older design freeze tight enough that the stem breaks if you apply enough force.

Oddly the 2-1/2” Apollo ball valve seacock will break a stem once in a while. Never seen that happen with the smaller ones.
__________________
Retired from Hopkins-Carter Marine Supplies
HopCar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2018, 21:40   #35
Marine Service Provider
 
mitiempo's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Victoria B.C.
Boat: Wauquiez Centurion 32
Posts: 2,875
Re: Flanged seacocks vs Inline Valve with Thruhull and backing block

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcboomer View Post
Trudesign are NOT Marelon.
Same material without the trademarked name. Glass fiber reinforced nylon.
mitiempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hull


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flanged & Castellated Prop Nut (A Myth?) GuidoY Propellers & Drive Systems 11 29-04-2014 14:28
2-Piece Flanged Through-Hull/Value Vs. Flanged Seacock zboss Construction, Maintenance & Refit 11 02-07-2013 07:50
engine thruhull valve question with pic feltonmichael Plumbing Systems and Fixtures 12 29-04-2013 09:54
Dripping valve at AC intake thruhull StanleyCup Construction, Maintenance & Refit 16 01-08-2012 04:27
For Sale: Conbraco Apollo 3/4" Flanged Seacocks Greg S Classifieds Archive 0 28-03-2012 12:41

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.