Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Engineering & Systems > Construction, Maintenance & Refit
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
  This discussion is proudly sponsored by:
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. Advertise Here
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 19-09-2008, 06:47   #31
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia
Boat: B24
Posts: 785
Images: 62
The thread-drift-police may nail me, but I’ve been pondering a similar question with our B24… For the moment, some sort of power is almost a requirement to get out of our slip (requires a full 360 in narrow channel to get to from our slip to the little inlet from our bay), but I don’t plan to be here forever… Plus, with the motor in the well, the prop has never come out of the water that I’m aware of – regardless of chop, so there are significant advantages to just leaving stuff alone… but, my relationship with this little motor is sort of love/hate… and, the nature of the motor well is that rascal and its paraphernalia take up an inordinate amount of space that could be used for a roomy lazarett, not to mention adding buoyancy if that hole was glassed in…
  • I’ve thought about keeping things the way they are – but would like some feedback on longer-term cruising and/or intercoastal running with a 2-cycle outboard in these days of ethanol gas, etc…
  • Or, bite the bullet and find a small 8-10hp diesel and spend a winter glassing the well, and installing a full inboard under the cockpit -- more smelliness, and then I must cuddle up to a hunk of cast-iron…
  • Or, as this thread seems to suggest, trash the whole thing altogether and get a couple of big sweeps for flat water maneuvering…
  • Or, another option is to glass in the well and do a transom mount for the outboard, but I like this least of all – ugly, ugly…
Experiences, advice, suggestion, or… ???
__________________
Larry
dcstrng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2008, 08:06   #32
Registered User
 
Eleven's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton UK
Boat: Jaguar 22 mono called Arfur.
Posts: 1,220
Images: 3
I'd go for electrikery drive. Using a commercial generator (fuel of choice) bolted in a convenient place and used to charge a couple of batteries for silent manouvreing and departure. Also gives you on board power for cooking, and other little luxuries and power tools. And it's portable to the repair shop and so on and so-on.
I'd be worried about any lee shore when the wind dissappears (every evening). Doesn't take a lot of power to motor away at to or three knots and does add precision manouvreing, especially if you can arrange the prop to steer. Electric outboards are getting pretty pokey and will drive your dink too.
Clip it on, use it, put it back in the locker.
__________________
Ex Prout 31 Sailor, Now it's a 22ft Jaguar called 'Arfur' here in sunny Southampton, UK.
A few places left in Quayside Marina and Kemps Marina.
Eleven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2008, 10:03   #33
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia
Boat: B24
Posts: 785
Images: 62
I’ve read of folks successfully using that type of drive on a few boats (usually multihulls or low-speed classics ) -- but besides the fact there is little free space (24 foot on deck) for the machinery, and no appreciable savings in space over the powerhead of the outboard, and the fact I don’t have much faith in dependency on electricity (within a hundred miles of salt-water), I’ve not considered that as a viable option for this application… truth is, I think me and technogizmos are from different solar systems, and different centuries…
__________________
Larry
dcstrng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 20:22   #34
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Worland, WY
Boat: Southern Cross 28 - Raggedy Edge
Posts: 2
Going engineless? Be sure to check out Jay Fitzgerald's books and website oarclub.org. He also is interviewed on FurledSails.com. I agree with Jay. The motor is for the most part a hazard. It is a fire hazard. It is more likely to fail when most needed. It wastes so much storage space and blocks access to things that need to be maintained and monitored. Half the cost and time of maintaining a sailboat is engine related. Just get a boat that you can easily handle.And instead of spending time and money on the diesel, spend it learning how to really sail.
__________________
MAL
The Meek Shall Inherit the Gulag
Raggedy Edge
raggedyedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 00:32   #35
Registered User
 
Talbot's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brighton, UK
Boat: Privilege 37
Posts: 3,740
Images: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedyedge View Post
The motor is for the most part a hazard. It is a fire hazard. It is more likely to fail when most needed. It wastes so much storage space and blocks access to things that need to be maintained and monitored. Half the cost and time of maintaining a sailboat is engine related. Just get a boat that you can easily handle.
That would not work in European marinas where you need an engine due to the lack of space between rows of boats. It would also be a severe constraint in an area of big tides.

If you think they are likely to fail, and have been taking up 50% of your maintenance time, it is more than time for you to upgrade to a modern diesel.
__________________
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss."
Robert A Heinlein
Talbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 08:07   #36
Registered User
 
Reality Check's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Indies, Now live aboard as cruiser/ voyager often with guest/ friends
Boat: 36' Bene
Posts: 585
Send a message via ICQ to Reality Check
Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedyedge View Post
Going engineless? Be sure to check out Jay Fitzgerald's books and website oarclub.org. He also is interviewed on FurledSails.com. I agree with Jay. The motor is for the most part a hazard. It is a fire hazard. It is more likely to fail when most needed. It wastes so much storage space and blocks access to things that need to be maintained and monitored. Half the cost and time of maintaining a sailboat is engine related. Just get a boat that you can easily handle.And instead of spending time and money on the diesel, spend it learning how to really sail.
Nice nostalgic thought but not real world. In most modern countries the anchorages, mooring fields and almost every marina are too constrained for someone to not have an engine on an average size cruising boat. You would be a danger/ hazard not only to yourself but to every other boat in the area. That is in average conditions, in lesser conditions you would simply be a mennis to navigation in every sense of the word and should be treated as such if you cause damage or risk of damage to others.... including the potential search and rescue people attempting to care for you if you intentionally placed yourself in those circumstances by your own choices.

Anyone can and at one time probably will have engine failure. Having the skill to safely anchor/ moor or dock a boat is always a critical sailing skill that many don't keep as well honed as they should be. These should be practiced in safe conditions frequently as would be engine repairs afloat practice. Back up contingencies are part of every competent sailors requirements for safe sailing for everyone. Sail with out an engine aboard when you wish but in most cruising boats today you should have a back up plan when the stuff hits the fan or when safe distances can not effectively be maintained when in proximity to other peoples property. Be a sailor but don't be an irresponsible one.
__________________
I prefer a sailboat to a motorboat, and it is my belief that boat sailing is a finer, more difficult, and sturdier art than running a motor.
--- Jack London
Reality Check is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 08:21   #37
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,413
Although one could sail without a motor or electronics it's neither a prudent thing to do or logical. It makes things much more difficult, but you would be one hell of a sailor if you do pull it off.
Sandero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:00   #38
Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South of St. Louis
Boat: not much yet
Posts: 170
Beginner question. Why aren't the 50 to 100 pound thrust trolling motors that move big pontoon boats around with ease discussed more as an option? 24 volt versus 48. 500$ versus 5000$
One, or even two of them on larger boats would seem to be a nice compromise.
Ahnlaashock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 12:22   #39
Registered User
 
SkiprJohn's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nicholasville, Kentucky
Boat: 15 foot Canoe
Posts: 14,191
We use electric trolling motors on our 19 and 26 foot boats from time to time when we can't sail on and off our moorings. Continuous operation is a drain on batteries but for just getting on and off moorings or into slips they work just fine unless you are bucking an extreme tide or river.
Battery banks are heavy and that is important for lighter sailing boats.
Regards,
JohnL
SkiprJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 13:48   #40
Registered User
 
Randy's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Boat: Farrier f27
Posts: 704
Boatyard is talking about a 24' boat.
My perspective is this: In his case with me not knowing the boat, it just serves to develop sailing skills which would do anyone good. Some boats can't get out of their own way without an engine essentially making them motor-sailers whether they're called that or not. As has been noted many people have sailed all over the world engine-less. The Pardee's have spent years sailing throughtout Europe - engineless.

My boat's outboard was so unreliable that sailing in and out of slips became routine. My next boat (<30' ultralight mono) will have an outboard. Long term my intention is to have a mid-30' with a diesel.
Implying that Boatyard is irresponsible for thinking of going engineless is absurd.
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 14:13   #41
Registered User
 
Talbot's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brighton, UK
Boat: Privilege 37
Posts: 3,740
Images: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
Implying that Boatyard is irresponsible for thinking of going engineless is absurd.
I dont think anyone is saying that. There are places where being able to sail in an out is a viable system. There are other marinas (particularly in UK) where the tide is to fast and wind too flukey for this to be feasible. That doesnt mean that you cant get into these marina, because most of them have some form of workboat available. For others, even negotiating the harbour entrance is a bit of a nightmare in an engineless boat. I have towed boats through Portsmouth harbour entrance because their engine was not powerfull enough to get the boat through against the tide!
__________________
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss."
Robert A Heinlein
Talbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 21:13   #42
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 195
Iron spinnaker = 2 or 3 crew

Having an iron, or electric spinnaker is just like having two or three extra crew on an engineless yacht. My first real cruise was on board the Folkboat 'Jellicle II' with sweep but without engine. The skipper had already sailed to New Zealand in his first sloop, without engine so, this was a real experience.

We would row an anchor out for tight corners. Sail out of notorious harbours or anchorages at ten minutes notice if the weather changed suspiciously. It was a great way to train the senses; develop judgment and keep clean below. Now electricity or other stored energy would be great. Two Chinese ros, or sweeps, would still be handy as they are faster and more powerful than straight sweeps; there is always the time when a line is around the screw and it is taking too long to clear. Ros work well on multihulls, too.
George Wade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
no motor


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motor cruising in size mega-xxl Amgine Flotsam & Sailing Miscellany 2 22-11-2008 11:12
Motor Cruising from California Through Panama Canal to Florida susanp Other 2 07-08-2008 14:09
TRAWLER & CRUISING MOTOR YACHTS sinbad7 Forum Tech Support & Site Help 2 01-07-2005 13:30
Long term budget. Alan Wheeler General Sailing Forum 3 20-06-2005 10:16
Wanted - Long term cruising companion ccannan Crew Archives 0 21-06-2003 08:23

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:23.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.