Cruisers Forum
 

Go Back   Cruisers & Sailing Forums > Scuttlebutt > Destinations > Great Lakes
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-08-2008, 01:41   #1
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
Intercoster waterway clearance?

We are able to offer a taller rig and more sail area. The standard size is influenced by the clearance of bridges along the US inter coaster waterway.(answer from Antares)

I got this answer from Antares, about smaller rig than other brands. What is the clearance at the intercostal way?
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 02:34   #2
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 35
With the exception of one bridge near Miami, 65ft is the controlling height of fixed bridges along the east coast ICW. If you're still looking for a boat, ours has an air draft of 48ft and is very much for sale. Check out the below link. We were able to cross the Okeechobee Waterway with no problem and also had no problem in the ICW. Our draft is 3'10" which is quite shallow for a 50 ft vessel.
Scott
Schucker 50 GOLDIE: Pilothouse Motorsailer for sale
Goldie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 02:40   #3
Senior Cruiser
 
GordMay's Avatar

Cruisers Forum Supporter

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario - 48-29N x 89-20W
Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
Posts: 49,948
Images: 241
Check out:
http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...rway-1213.html
__________________
Gord May
"If you didn't have the time or money to do it right in the first place, when will you get the time/$ to fix it?"



GordMay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-08-2008, 20:46   #4
Registered User

Join Date: May 2003
Location: East Coast & Other Forums!
Posts: 917
Freetime...65 except for the Julia Tuttle bridge in Miami is correct but at least one bridge in North Carolina is claimed to be only 64'...You CAN go around this bridge on an alternate ICW route so it is not critical.
Also...anything greater than a 6' draft will be problematic on some sections of the ICW though I know deeper draft boats have made it with tidal help.
__________________

camaraderie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 12:43   #5
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldie View Post
With the exception of one bridge near Miami, 65ft is the controlling height of fixed bridges along the east coast ICW. If you're still looking for a boat, ours has an air draft of 48ft and is very much for sale. Check out the below link. We were able to cross the Okeechobee Waterway with no problem and also had no problem in the ICW. Our draft is 3'10" which is quite shallow for a 50 ft vessel.
Scott
Schucker 50 GOLDIE: Pilothouse Motorsailer for sale
Hi,

I like your boat.

Your boat looks little like Nauticat Yachts Oy except the stern. But we want a catamaran or a fast sailboat.
But this time i want a catamaran, probably!
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 12:44   #6
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaraderie View Post
Freetime...65 except for the Julia Tuttle bridge in Miami is correct but at least one bridge in North Carolina is claimed to be only 64'...You CAN go around this bridge on an alternate ICW route so it is not critical.
Also...anything greater than a 6' draft will be problematic on some sections of the ICW though I know deeper draft boats have made it with tidal help.
Is the ICW ok for a multihull? or do i need a narrower hull somewhere?
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 12:45   #7
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
61f is what i found on internet!?
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 13:05   #8
jzk
Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 678
InTRAcoastal Waterway.
jzk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 13:43   #9
Registered User
 
Vasco's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Boat: CS36Merlin, "La Belle Aurore"
Posts: 7,557
Officially the bridges are supposed to be 65 ft with the exception of the Julia Tuttle in Miami. However, more than one bridge might be a tad lower! In addition in certain stretches the water might be a lot higher due to run-off or wind blowing it in. If you're at the ICW height limit you have to really check the height before you try it. On most bridges there are boards showing the clearance. Also you have to make sure a big mother of a power boat or even a small power boat is not going to throw a wake as you go under. I have seen large catamarans back through bridges. I guess it's easier to go full ahead if you touch!
__________________
Rick I
Toronto in summer, Bahamas in winter.
Vasco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 13:46   #10
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jzk View Post
InTRAcoastal Waterway.
http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...9&postcount=20

And remember to prounounce Outremer: ooo - tra - mer


TRA again
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 13:50   #11
Registered User
 
freetime's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 685
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasco View Post
Officially the bridges are supposed to be 65 ft with the exception of the Julia Tuttle in Miami. However, more than one bridge might be a tad lower! In addition in certain stretches the water might be a lot higher due to run-off or wind blowing it in. If you're at the ICW height limit you have to really check the height before you try it. On most bridges there are boards showing the clearance. Also you have to make sure a big mother of a power boat or even a small power boat is not going to throw a wake as you go under. I have seen large catamarans back through bridges. I guess it's easier to go full ahead if you touch!
Good info. Thanks.
freetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 13:54   #12
cruiser

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by freetime View Post
Is the ICW ok for a multihull? or do i need a narrower hull somewhere?
The ICW is no problem for any multihull. There is plenty of room for very large vessels to pass.
ssullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-08-2008, 14:13   #13
Eternal Member
 
imagine2frolic's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Brisas Panama AGAIN!
Boat: Simpson, Catamaran, 46ft. IMAGINE
Posts: 4,507
Images: 123
Pass one at a time. There was a couple of bascule bridges that were a wee bit narrow. A power boater, and I had some words as he tried to push me out with me being the down current vessel, and against the lifting side of the bridge. As far as depth, no problem for multis.
imagine2frolic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bridge Clearance on the Intracoastal Waterway 2divers Navigation 33 30-12-2015 17:49
Status of Okeechobee Waterway? Entlie Other 3 28-08-2009 15:59
Gulf Intracoastal waterway Room with a View Cruising News & Events 2 02-05-2008 18:47
Hull clearance from the water KIWI Multihull Sailboats 24 29-01-2008 11:31
Waterway Guide Pisces The Library 0 29-03-2003 08:30

Advertise Here


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36.


Google+
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

ShowCase vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.