Changes in Atlantic currents

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

So is that a yes, no or dodge?

No - I apply the test myself. Your posts are total failures.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Not to be pedantic, but check out the peaks and troughs at comparable periods.

To be less than pedantic. Out what did you pull that graphic?

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

To refresh your failing memory - you accused me of revisionist history

I accused you of quoting revisionist history.

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

I accused you of quoting revisionist history.

Provide the evidence that it revisionist history.

Here is the source: https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research//...999_hansen_07/

[Reefmagnet]

Are these revisions?

[jackdale]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Are these revisions?

Are they? It is your assertion. I taught my students that they had to support their assertions, not ask others to do it for them.

You are still using the weak technique: https://tinyurl.com/yneznczy

[tp12]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

Not to be pedantic, but check out the peaks and troughs at comparable periods.

I’m not sure what you’re missing here but ok

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by tp12

I’m not sure what you’re missing here but ok

I think your missing that the graphs don't match even when allowing for the exponential scale on one of them. This means that either both are wrong or one is right.



And just for the (non Tim Wirth style) record, I made no assertion as to which is right and which is wrong other than to note that one (at least) must be wrong.

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

Are they? It is your assertion. I taught my students that they had to support their assertions, not ask others to do it for them.

You are still using the weak technique: https://tinyurl.com/yneznczy

I'm not asserting anything. I asked you a question. Are they revisions? If not, what are they?

[tp12]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

I think your missing that the graphs don't match even when allowing for the exponential scale on one of them. This means that either both are wrong or one is right.



And just for the (non Tim Wirth style) record, I made no assertion as to which is right and which is wrong other than to note that one (at least) must be wrong.

No mate, that’s really not it at all. You posted a completely different time as some kind of evidence that a graph that JD posted was revising history. They’re completely different and I’m struggling to understand why you can’t see that

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by tp12

No mate, that’s really not it at all. You posted a completely different time as some kind of evidence that a graph that JD posted was revising history. They’re completely different and I’m struggling to understand why you can’t see that

You don't seem to be one to pick up on the cues much? Notice one chart is trending warmer and the other colder?

[tp12]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

You don't seem to be one to pick up on the cues much? Notice one chart is trending warmer and the other colder?

Wow. No, that’s not it. Glacial periods where there weren’t any…seriously, slow down and actually read the graphs.

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by jackdale

To refresh your failing memory - you accused me of revisionist history

If your quoting based on revisions of temperature data, you're quoting revisionist history. It's funny how that works, isn't it?

[Reefmagnet]

Originally Posted by tp12

Wow. No, that’s not it. Glacial periods where there weren’t any…seriously, slow down and actually read the graphs.

You'll need to take that argument up with the Geological Society of America. It's out of my pay grade.

[tp12]

Originally Posted by Reefmagnet

You'll need to take that argument up with the Geological Society of America. It's out of my pay grade.

No, it’s simple as you misreading the axis of a graph. That’s it.