Science & Technology News

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by GordMay

BioNTech plans to make vaccines in shipping containers
BioNTech wants to use shipping containers as standardised vaccine factories, to expand capacity worldwide. The firm plans to send its containerised mRNA factories to parts of the world that lack their own manufacturing capabilities. The first will arrive in an undisclosed country in Africa towards the end of 2022.
More about ➥ https://www.economist.com/science-an...utm_id=1055648

Africa accounts for just 3.6% of doses administered globally, partly because of hesitancy but mainly because it has struggled to get supplies and distribute them.
More about ➥ https://www.economist.com/leaders/20...utm_id=1055648

Containerized weapons systems is not a new idea. There is evidence that China has missiles sleeping all over America. The anti population "vaccines" are only another weapon to destroy large numbers of humanity. And the irony is that everyone who got the shot accepted it voluntarily.

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by GordMay

Indeed.
An extraordinarily well coordinated conspiracy to deceive us all.

270 experts from 67 countries were invited to take on their roles in the WGII contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report [approved, line by line, by 195 member governments] . Of the selected experts, 47 are Coordinating Lead Authors and 184 are Lead Authors who have the collective responsibility for the contents of their assigned chapters and cross-chapter papers in the report. 39 of the experts are Review Editors who ensure that all substantive comments during the review stages are given appropriate consideration by the Authors. 57% of the selected experts come from developing countries and countries with economies in transition, and 43% are from developed countries. 54% of the selected experts are new to the IPCC process.
Total number of expert and government review comments received was 62,418.
The full list of Coordinating Lead Authors, Lead Authors and Review Editors for the Working Group II contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report is available in the author database.
➥ https://apps.ipcc.ch/report/authors/...rs.php?q=36&p=

Another attempt to derail science by numbers of experts that take a certain position. Consensus does not confirm science. If one scientist by scientific means proves something to be correct. It would not matter if 100 000 others disagree. The climate cultists try to turn science into a democratic process. There is no scientific consensus on climate change. It is not possible to have scientific consensus. It is only possible to have political consensus. This proves that the notion of anthropomorphic climate change has only been a political debate under the guise of false science. The idea was first promoted on large scale by Margret Thatcher as a threat against striking coal miners. It arose out of politics, not science.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by GordMay

OPINION
For the climate, look to what works now

Governments must focus on solutions that are already working, even when they aren’t glamorous or supported by powerful lobbyists.

Climate change won’t wait for future innovation, argues science-policy researcher Marie Claire Brisbois — we need action now.
Hydrogen fuel, new nuclear technologies and carbon capture and storage will be crucial for decarbonization, “but let’s not pretend they’ll be here fast enough”, she writes.
In contrast, quotidian changes — such as insulating homes, driving less, repairing appliances and eating less meat — are already working.
“Unglamorous solutions have few politically powerful advocates,” she notes. “One way to counter the fixation on profitable rather than proven climate solutions is for analysts and researchers assessing policy options to build in metrics of environmental sustainability, social connection, health and other indicators of well-being.”

"Climate change won’t wait for future innovation — we need action now"
More ➥ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00560-2

The most important word to pay attention to is the first word..

OPINION

[SailOar]

Climate change has likely begun to suffocate the world's fisheries

By 2080, around 70% of the world's oceans could be suffocating from a lack of oxygen as a result of climate change, potentially impacting marine ecosystems worldwide, according to a new study. The new models find mid-ocean depths that support many fisheries worldwide are already losing oxygen at unnatural rates and passed a critical threshold of oxygen loss in 2021.

[The study] finds that significant, potentially irreversible deoxygenation of the ocean's middle depths that support much of the world's fished species began occurring in 2021, likely affecting fisheries worldwide. The new models predict that deoxygenation is expected to begin affecting all zones of the ocean by 2080.

[Dieseldude]

Originally Posted by SailOar

Climate change has likely begun to suffocate the world's fisheries

By 2080, around 70% of the world's oceans could be suffocating from a lack of oxygen as a result of climate change, potentially impacting marine ecosystems worldwide, according to a new study. The new models find mid-ocean depths that support many fisheries worldwide are already losing oxygen at unnatural rates and passed a critical threshold of oxygen loss in 2021.

[The study] finds that significant, potentially irreversible de-oxygenation of the ocean's middle depths that support much of the world's fished species began occurring in 2021, likely affecting fisheries worldwide. The new models predict that deoxygenation is expected to begin affecting all zones of the ocean by 2080.

Another half statement to rouse alarmism. Ocean Oxygen content does not prove man made warming. Ocean oxygen content can vary independent of human activity.

[Lake-Effect]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

Another half statement to rouse alarmism. Ocean Oxygen content does not prove man made warming. Ocean oxygen content can vary independent of human activity.

So there's yet another thing you don't have a handle on. Quel surprise.

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

... Consensus does not confirm science. If one scientist by scientific means proves something to be correct. It would not matter if 100 000 others disagree...

Albert Einstein said something similar, but different. “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.”

Speaking of which:
“Student: “Dr. Einstein, Aren't these the same questions as last year's [physics] final exam?”
Dr. Einstein: “Yes; But this year the answers are different.”

[GordMay]

Originally Posted by newhaul

The most important word to pay attention to is the first word..
OPINION

Which is why I colored the word red. Unlike many others [including you], I differentiate fact from opinion.

[bcboomer]

Originally Posted by Dieseldude

There is evidence that China has missiles sleeping all over America. Source?

The anti population "vaccines" are only another weapon to destroy large numbers of humanity. And the irony is that everyone who got the shot accepted it voluntarily.

Where are the large numbers of dead from the vaccine?

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by bcboomer

Where are the large numbers of dead from the vaccine?

Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Vaccinated now account for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths in England…

and the triple vaccinated accounted for 4 in every 5 of them…

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/01/ru...-covid-deaths/

Ask and ye shall receive. Not hidden like by the governments here.

Have 3 relatives that died from the jab but none from covid .

[bcboomer]

Originally Posted by newhaul

Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Vaccinated now account for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths in England…

and the triple vaccinated accounted for 4 in every 5 of them…

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/01/ru...-covid-deaths/

Ask and ye shall receive. Not hidden like by the governments here.

Have 3 relatives that died from the jab but none from covid .

Ignoring the fact that you are again quoting a discredited source, they are not dying from the vaccine. Surprised you don't understand the difference.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by bcboomer

Ignoring the fact that you are again quoting a discredited source, they are not dying from the vaccine. Surprised you don't understand the difference.

Ok they are dying with the vaccine .
Is that better.

[bcboomer]

Originally Posted by newhaul

Ok they are dying with the vaccine .
Is that better.

Sure. But your fellow conspiracy-theorist, Dieseldude, claims the vaccine is killing humanity and that the Chinese have weapons "all over America".

I want to know his source.: wink:

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by bcboomer

Sure. But your fellow conspiracy-theorist, Dieseldude, claims the vaccine is killing humanity and that the Chinese have weapons "all over America".

I want to know his source.: wink:

Oh he must mean the squad supporters.

[newhaul]

Originally Posted by bcboomer

Ignoring the fact that you are again quoting a discredited source, they are not dying from the vaccine. Surprised you don't understand the difference.

Only discredited by a few people that don't like what it prints .

Look at CNN .